No, we don't. We should continue to use production accounts though.
Greig
On 10/03/08 13:31, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in addition to John questions... do we really need sgm accounts on the
> storage?
>
> thanks
>
> cheers
> alessandra
>
> John Bland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're in the process of setting up reservations for VOs on our dcache
>> system but ran into a problem with standard and prd/sgm accounts.
>>
>> Our current account mapping system maps standard accounts to VO001,
>> prd accounts to prdVO01 and sgm accounts to sgmVO01.
>>
>> The reservation linkgroupauthorisations, however, are just for the
>> standard account and the examples shown in previous threads by other
>> sites don't have any mention of sgm/prd accounts in them. This leads
>> to sgmops jobs being unable to write to the dteam/ops reservation.
>>
>> LinkGroup dteam-linkGroup
>> dteam001/Role=*
>> /dteam/Role=*
>> ops001/Role=*
>> /ops/Role=*
>> sgmops01/Role=*
>> /ops/Role=*
>>
>> LinkGroup lhcb-linkGroup
>> lhcb001/Role=*
>> /lhcb/Role=*
>>
>> LinkGroup atlas-linkGroup
>> atlas001/Role=*
>> /atlas/Role=*
>>
>>
>> Are we mapping our accounts incorrectly for dcache or is there a
>> recommended way of authorising them for reservations (the sgmops entry
>> above didn't work)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> John
>>
>
|