JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CAS Archives


CAS Archives

CAS Archives


CAS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CAS Home

CAS Home

CAS  March 2008

CAS March 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

ART MACHINES – MACHINE ART

From:

Paul Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Computer Arts Society <[log in to unmask]>, Paul Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 09:17:57 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (167 lines)

The Museum turns into a Production Hall
ART MACHINES   MACHINE ART
Basel, March 5 – June 29, 2008

Opening Tuesday, March 4, 2008, 18.30 hrs

  We all agree that art is created by artists. But what happens when  
machines start producing art? Do artists become simple engineers?  
What lies behind the artist’s withdrawal from the creative act, and  
what is its bearing on the originality and the uniqueness of the  
artwork? What can we then consider as the artwork: the machine, the  
final product or the process of creation? The exhibition jointly  
conceived and elaborated by Katharina Dohm of the Schirn Kunsthalle  
Frankfurt and Heinz Stahlhut of the Museum Tinguely, Basel, opens  
with a presentation of Jean Tinguely’s drawing machines dating back  
to the 1950s followed by art machines down to the present day; all of  
these have a common feature: they produce their own art. These  
machines created by Angela Bulloch, Olafur Eliasson, Damien Hirst,  
Rebecca Horn, Jon Kessler, Tim Lewis, Lia, Miltos Manetas, Cornelia  
Sollfrank, Antoine Zgraggen and Andreas Zybach transform the Museum  
Tinguely, Basel, into a production hall. Depending on the mechanical  
process involved, visitors may keep certain works such as drawings  
produced by Jean Tinguely’s Meta-Matics and certified stamped sheets  
produced by Damien Hirst’s or Olafur Eliasson’s machines.

  “People’s basic trust in machine activity, the basis of our  
industrial revolution and our affluence, is fundamentally alien to  
art’s self-understanding; and so art was very reticent to use  
machines to create itself. But to create a machine as an artwork and  
to shift responsibility to it for the development of further works of  
art abrogates the artist’s autonomy and transfers creativity to an  
apparatus. This raises an issue that is very much in vogue in view of  
today’s permanent shifting frontiers between the individual and  
technology.” (Guido Magnaguagno, Director Museum Tinguely and Max  
Hollein, Director, Schirn)

„If one accepts the general assumption that artists, not machines,  
are the originators and creators of works of art, then the  
discrepancy between the two could not be greater. For while the  
machine is conceived with an aim toward qualities like repeatability  
of production processes, art, as traditionally understood, is  
characterised by uniqueness. Tied to this is the idea of the artistic  
individual as a creative genius. And this concept gives rise to the  
question – serious as well as ironical – posed in this  
exhibition.” (Katharina Dohm and Heinz Stahlhut, curators of the  
exhibition)

To create a machine as an artwork and to entrust it with the  
responsibility of developing further artworks is a radical step. It  
means delegating creativity to a piece of equipment. Do such art  
machines then possess a “soul”? Indeed, they develop a dynamic of  
their own and enable the creation of an artwork that is an  
independent work – but they lack the capacity to lead the work to its  
conclusion. The machine with its automatic process does not posses  
the faculty of decision nor the possibility of selection. What is  
produced are mechanical works of art lacking the factor finality, but  
they are nevertheless a fundamental avowal of and testimony to the  
sovereignty of the machine and the basic belief in the possibilities  
of creative production beyond the act of the individual.

The exhibition „Art Machines Machine Art” opens with 20th century  
works by Jean Tinguely that raise the issue of the machine as an  
independent creative apparatus in the most original manner. His Méta- 
Matics that were first exhibited in Paris in 1959 and earned him his  
international renown are motor-driven drawing machines that enable  
the spectator to produce abstract drawings. The discrepancy between  
the material character of the Méta-Matics and their function, which  
is to produce art, can well be interpreted as an ironic comment on  
the overriding belief in those days in technical progress. It further  
also translates a reflex of the art context of the 1950s: the  
mechanically produced drawings are in keeping with the Tachist style  
in painting and thus reduce ad absurdum the idea of gestural  
abstraction as the direct expression of an artistic individual. This  
work group doubtless forms the historical basis of the exhibition.  
Grouped around it is a selection of works that share a common trait:  
the creative act is delegated by the artist to the machine – a  
process that was only possible at the end of the second world war  
when a generation of young artists appeared on the scene and broke  
with one of the best kept taboos of European art: the concept of the  
original work of art. The selection reflects this process in the most  
various art media such as painting, drawing, sculpture, video and  
ends with the greatest “art machine” ever, the World Wide Web,  
without, however, affording a definitive answer.

The visitor to the exhibition will encounter machines such as Rebecca  
Horn’s Preussische Brautmaschine and Michael Beutler’s installation  
Proper en Droog that concluded production before the exhibition’s  
opening, whereas Roxy Paine’s SCUMAK #2 produces throughout the  
duration of the exhibition, in this case organic-like sculptures. The  
drawing machines Making Beautiful Drawings by Damien Hirst and The  
endless study by Olafur Eliasson both require the involvement of the  
visitor and pose the basic question as to the relationship between  
onlooker and artwork. Whilst a physical phenomenon is at the source  
of Eliasson’s work, Hirst addresses the issue of the creative genius.  
Andreas Zybach’s Sich selbst reproduzierender Sockel contrary to its  
title does not auto-reproduce but requires an input by the visitor in  
the same manner that Angela Bulloch’s Blue Horizon needs an external  
impulse to begin drawing. Jon Kessler’s video installation Desert  
produces sunsets without end, and Tim Lewis’ Auto-Dali Prosthetic non- 
stop scrawls signatures. Pawel Althamer’s Extrusion Machine (Bottle  
Machine) produces blasphemous plastic bottles; thanks to Antoine  
Zgraggen’s Grosser Hammer and his Zerquetscherin the visitor can get  
rid of unwanted objects, and Tue Greenfort’s Mobile  
Trinkglaswerkstatt transforms glass bottles into drinking glasses.  
Finally, with the works of Lia, Miltos Manetas and Cornelia Sollfrank  
the “Méta art machine” enters into play – the World Wide Web –  
extending the possibility of democratising art production, as did  
Tinguely’s works in the 1950s.

The relationship between artist, artwork and onlooker is the theme,  
but not always at the basis of all the exhibits. The art machine  
enables furthermore the participation of the public and mass-produced  
art, thus breaking significantly with the aura of non-reproducible  
art. Even though the onlooker is not directly involved in the  
creation of some of the works, he/she does gain an insight into its  
production and is thus led to reflect on the issue as to where the  
work of art begins. The artist, however, will never disappear  
completely from the work of art. The art machine remains a tool as  
long as it functions within the parameters of the artist. It is only  
if and when it starts to act independently and react to situations  
autonomously that the whole question of authorship can change. The  
creativity of the art machine is apparent only when it works without  
control and haphazardly. The machine may be able to produce without  
the presence of the artist but it cannot exist without the artist’s  
concept.

An exhibition of the Museum Tinguely, Basel and Schirn Kunsthalle  
Frankfurt. Curators: Heinz Stahlhut (Museum Tinguely) / Katharina  
Dohm (Schirn).

Participating artists: Pawel Althamer, Michael Beutler, Angela  
Bulloch, Olafur Eliasson, Tue Greenfort, Damien Hirst, Rebecca Horn,  
Jon Kessler, Tim Lewis, Lia, Miltos Manetas, Roxy Paine, Steven  
Pippin, Cornelia Sollfrank, Jean Tinguely, Antoine Zgraggen, Andreas  
Zybach.

Catalogue: Art Machines Machine Art. Ed. Katharina Dohm, Heinz  
Stahlhut, Max Hollein and Guido Magnaguagno. Preface by Max Hollein  
and Guido Magnaguagno, Texts by Katharina Dohm and Heinz Stahlhut,  
and Justin Hoffmann and in-depth comments. German-English edition, c.  
160 pages, c. 130 col. & b&w illustrations, hard cover, Kehrer  
Verlag, Heidelberg, ISBN 9 783939 583400 (Price: CHF 49).

Museum Tinguely Paul Sacher Anlage 1 – CH 4002 BASEL – www.tinguely.ch

Press Release and images available for download on the Internet site  
www.tinguely.ch

For further information:

Annja Müller-Alsbach, Curator. Tel.: 00 41 (0)61 688 26 18. E-mail:  
[log in to unmask]

Laurentia Leon, Press Office. Tel.: 00 41 (0)61 687 46 08. E-mail:  
[log in to unmask]


====
Paul Brown - based in OZ Dec 07 - Apr 08
mailto:[log in to unmask] == http://www.paul-brown.com
OZ Landline +61 (0)7 5443 3491 == USA fax +1 309 216 9900
OZ Mobile +61 (0)419 72 74 85 == Skype paul-g-brown
====
Visiting Professor - Sussex University
http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/ccnr/research/creativity.html
====

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager