JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  February 2008

POETRYETC February 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: yesterday--skip if you can't take any more politics

From:

Anny Ballardini <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc: poetry and poetics

Date:

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:14:03 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (185 lines)

I praise your objective outlook on Obama, which I would apply to Hillary
Clinton, too. I belong to that group of people that see politicians as a
quite corrupted caste especially after all these years spent in Italy. The
president of our province (not region) South Tyrol of which Bolzano is the
main town with 100,000 inhabitants earns 25,000 euros per month, while
writing the figure I still cannot believe it and I'd rather reduce it to
15,000, both seem shocking to me. By the way he belongs to the German ethnic
group: Mr. Durnwalder. My students told me and since I did not want to
believe it, one wrote a composition on it. Data were later confirmed. As I
said in class I would not accept such an amount of money only because I
would feel guilty in front of other people, what should I be doing to
deserve such a salary?
Since someone has to be chosen I agree with you that Hillary is
well-educated and has experience, hopefully she's practical enough to keep
faith to what she preaches. The Clinton era for those who lived abroad was a
panacea, Americans were finally recognized as living beings.
So long,

On Feb 7, 2008 2:53 PM, Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Obama's major role as a vp candidate, I think, would be to encourage
> Black and young supporters to make it to the polls. It's difficult to
> be messianic from the second slot. As always, it's the top of the
> ticket that makes the difference. After Clinton and McCain finished
> agreeing about the three or four non-Republican positions McCain
> holds it would be pretty much the usual slugfest about the war, the
> economy, healthcare, with the underlying mostly unacknowledged gender
> issue consuming a lot of the oxygen. McCain really has only one issue
> to run on. Women vote in larger percentages than men, and Hillary
> would get the entire antiwar vote. The likeability issue would of
> course be in play, but it's difficult to imagine that McCain would
> continue to succeed as the loveable, unpredictable younger brother as
> much as he has.
>
> I poet I greatly admire as both a writer and a person said on another
> list that she's voting for Obama because he makes her feel good--all
> that hope, all that unity. Messianism is a tricky business, and
> pretty neutral: the worst and some of the best politicians have
> espoused it. Hitler, according to Germans I've spoken to with
> impeccable and hard-earned antifascist credentials, was an amazing,
> inspiring speaker. One gets some sense of this from Triumph of the
> Will, which is so effective that I've found myself tearing up when
> watching it, and hating that I was doing so. I'm not saying that
> Obama is Hitler. He may even be a very nice man with good intentions,
> though I doubt those good intentions are what leads him to see
> himself as the necessary man of the hour--blind ambition and
> megalomania, the usual currency of presidential politics, is a safer
> assumption. But the manipulation is similar. Buttons are pushed, we
> suddenly feel part of a greater movement, our egos \melded with the
> crowd's--we become part of the messianic cause, larger and better
> than ourselves. My experience has been that one wakes up eventually
> with a very bad hangover. Kennedy, who was more fun (all those
> women), died before we found ourselves hovering around the toilet
> bowl. Inspiring to some (never to me--I would have preferred
> Stevenson), he gave us the Bay of Pigs and the Vietnam War and little
> else.
>
> I guess I don't like being manipulated. One can argue that all
> politicians do so, that Hillary was faking the emotional moment, but
> in general she has refused to do so, talking nuts and bolts and
> longterm goals instead. There's an honesty in that. And she'll get us
> universal health care if anyone can.
>
> Health care is a major issue in more ways than the obvious. Whenever
> I travel in countries where it exists I'm astonished by the
> difference in the tone of daily life, the lower stress-level, the
> sense of not being trapped by the need to maintain membership in this
> or that employer-generated plan. Want freedom? That's a place to start.
>
> OK, I've gone on too long. Obama could help a Clinton ticket just as
> effectively by campaigning for her as by campaigning with her.
>
> Mark
>
> At 05:52 AM 2/7/2008, you wrote:
> >If a Clinton/Obama ticket materializes, what result would you predict
> >against McCain/Whoever?
> >
> >Barry
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:09:06 -0500, Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
> >wrote:
> >
> > >I can't imagine either ticket, though I think Clinton/Obama would win
> > >extra votes. Obama is surely aware that whatever committments Clinton
> > >made upfront would be nonbinding. He would be better served to spend
> > >the next eight years becoming a first-rate, courageous senator,
> > >learning something perhaps from Ted Kennedy..
> > >
> > >Mark
> > >
> > >At 02:17 PM 2/6/2008, you wrote:
> > >>These divisions may well be resolved by a Clinton-Obama ticket. And
> this
> > >>only if Clinton (& Clinton) make a deal that gives Obama power and
> > >>experience.
> > >>
> > >>I can't imagine an Obama-Clinton ticket, unless she is far more
> altruistic
> > >>than any politician is allowed to be.
> > >>
> > >>On 2/6/08, Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > This may be inappropriate for a poetry list, but I've got to share
> it
> > >> > with someone. I just stopped off to pick up lunch at the Dominican
> > >> > place downstairs. On the counter were two tabloids,  the Daily
> News,
> > >> > which had a picture of the Giants homecoming, and El Diario, whose
> > >> > headline screamed "Fuerza Latina!" There's been a lot of writing
> > >> > about the mutual hostility of Black and Latino voters and its
> effect
> > >> > on primary votes, but I think there's something more at play: if
> > >> > Latinos go for Obama they're junior partners in his coalition. If
> > >> > they go for Hillary they play a major role in getting her
> > >> > elected--it's not just prejudice, or affection for Bill, but a
> sense
> > >> > of Latin power, as the gheadline says--that Latins will have chosen
> > >> > the president. And that, in America's (and almost anywhere else's)
> > >> > divisive politics, will give them a lot of clout.
> > >> >
> > >> > So I thought beyond this insight. Obama's campaign of generalized
> > >> > hope appeals overwhelmingly to Blacks, obviously, but also to
> > >> > upper-income, better-educated Whites, and students in training to
> > >> > become such, especially males. This is the least-vulnerable group
> in
> > >> > US society, and the best able to sustain a gamble. If Obama's
> health
> > >> > care plan fails, for instance, or fails to include 25 million
> people
> > >> > they don't socialize with, it barely affects them. Voting for an
> > >> > uplifting message entails little risk.
> > >> >
> > >> > That group, incidentally, tracks as more liberal than Clinton's
> > >> > supporters, although she is a shade to Obama's left
> > >> >
> > >> > Clinton's support comes almost entirely from those most vulnerable
> or
> > >> > most dissatisfied with the social constraints they perceive as
> placed
> > >> > upon them: the lower-income, less-educated, hispanic, elderly,
> > >> > female. All of these groups see themselves as outsiders
> > >> >
> > >> > So here's Obama's problem: he somehow has to gain the trust of
> > >> > Hillary's voters, who appear to be absolutely certain that anything
> > >> > they get will come out of the nasty business of hardball, divisive
> > >> > politics. If he loses to Hillary, some Black voters may or may not
> > >> > stay home in the general election, but the White Obama constituency
> > >> > will almost certainly fall in line. If Obama wins, he'll lose some
> of
> > >> > Hillary's constituency to McCain, who's well-liked by Hispanics and
> > >> > can speak the language of the elderly, and a great many of the
> > >> > lower-income will stay home, as they often do.
> > >> >
> > >> > Ironically, Hillary's despicable Iraq Resolution vote would
> probably
> > >> > neutralize some of McCain's appeal, although it's become
> increasingly
> > >> > clear that she'd get us out of Iraq no more slowly, and no faster,
> > >> > than Obama would.
> > >> >
> > >> > Mark
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>~ SB  | http://www.sbpoet.com |  =^..^=
> >
> >=========================================================================
>



-- 
Anny Ballardini
http://annyballardini.blogspot.com/
http://www.fieralingue.it/modules.php?name=poetshome
http://www.moriapoetry.com/ebooks.html
I Tell You: One must still have chaos in one to give birth to a dancing
star!

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager