Hello Klaus and listers
I agree Kenneth Gergen can be a little fuzzy at time but fortunately, as Vivian Burr (http://books.google.com.au/books?id=L301_vk1LzQC) and others show, Gergen's version of SC (if in fact it does arrant the critique Glasferled gives it) is neither the only nor the prototypical one. SC really is part of the standard sociological and philosophical conversation (to use James Gee and Richard Rorty's image) about agency and (social) structure. Although it will hardly do to trancher the matter Wikipedia's reference to weak and strong (perhaps Gergen) social constructionism, is relevant
Though social constructionism contains a diverse array of theories and beliefs, it can generally be divided into two camps: Weak social constructionism and strong social constructionism. The two differ mainly in degree, where weak social constructionists tend to see some underlying objective factual elements to reality, and strong social constructionists see everything as, in some way, a social construction. This is not to say that strong social constructionists see the world as ontologically unreal. Rather, they propose that the notions of "real" and "unreal" are themselves social constructs, so that the question of whether anything is "real" is just a matter of social convention.
Some other useful sources to see it's practical benefits are
Social constructionism and its relevance to health policy
This paper tracks the development of the social constructionist approach to
medical knowledge, and explores some of its implications for health policy and
medical sociology research. It suggests that the impetus for this approach came
in part from Eliot Freidson's recognition in the 1970s of the social character of
medical knowledge in both its production and its application, and the
difficulties this presented for the conventional conceptual schema in which he
framed the rest of his work. It is suggested that any policy moves to impinge on
medical decision-making in the name of greater efficiency would be preempted
by the strong interest shared by the medical profession and the economic
rationalists in shielding from public exposure the political values hidden
within their respective knowledge bases.
Thus SC has the kind of value other theories, models, stories might have in being practically relevant to focusing on the ideological conditions of knowledge and its use in different contexts. I suppose - Like a good pragmatist - I like weak versions of most theories (but not in my morning coffee) - and prefer to skip the label if possible.
Dr Gavin Melles
Lecturer, Research Degree Skills
Faculty of Design
Swinburne University of Technology
Mob (03) 0402927278
Swinburne University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code: 00111D
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the use of the addressee. They may contain information that is privileged or protected by copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, printing, copying or use is strictly prohibited. The University does not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are secure and there is also a risk that it may be corrupted in transmission. It is your responsibility to check any attachments for viruses or defects before opening them. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact us on +61 3 9214 8000 and delete it immediately from your system. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.