We have been playing around with the sample SPM data set available here (attention to visual motion):
We have analyzed the results using the directions listed in the "README_GLM_PPI.txt" data set (using the updated SPM5), but as you can see by the screen shot, we are obviously getting results that do not make sense (i.e. t values in the hundreds). We are probably doing some thing simple wrong, but it is not obvious to us yet what that is. Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Nonsensical results from sample SPM5 data set. What are we doing wrong?
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ