JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  February 2008

GP-UK February 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Options

From:

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

GP-UK <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:51:08 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (75 lines)

On 20/02/2008, Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> One might think that a body elected to represent or lead a group were in
> less of a position to lead them in open defiance of government and
> paying customer if they could not persuade their constituents to even
> answer a question than if they were.

In one sense the logic of the questions is impeccable. If we don't
accept the imposition of A then the Government will impose B. We are
invited to choose which would be less damaging (using our judgement
and skill) and then answer the tie-breaker "I didn't really want the
option I voted for because..."

However, option A is clearly less worse than option B as any fule kan
see. The question should be "do you wish us to accept option A on your
behalf or do you wish us to enter into a formal dispute?"

What I think we are complaining about is that the ballot does not
allow us to give a clear instruction to the GPC. I can tell you the
result now.
Option A - 70%
Option B and spoiled papers - 30%
"Less worse" and not "desired choice" - 98%

The GPC now appear to be shifting their position to "give in now,
fight later". I wonder how many GPs think that is the right thing to
do. Opinion on GP-UK is clear, no doubt DNUK is sold, even EMIS list
is becoming exercised over the situation.

Adrian is right that we need to express our opinion locally through
our GPC rep and our LMC meetings.

One possible point in favour of the GPC's apparent position is that
our difficulties appear to have arisen directly as a result of Gordon
Brown. GB has a reputation for being difficult, uncommunicative, and
making off-the-wall decisions. This will not endear him to his party.
His party are the only people who can stop him.

In our democracy there is a rough and ready set of checks and balances
which help to stop too much overt unfairness. For every issue there
are lobby groups who put their points across. By some inscrutable
process, ministers weigh up the issues and come to a reasonably fair
decision. If their decision is too biased then protests are made in
various quarters - through MPs, committees, the press. When the
pressure becomes intolerable then ministers have to give way - as
happened to Alistair Darling recently over capital gains tax.

What seems to have happened is that negotiations were going along
nicely when Gordon Brown came along and insisted on imposing tougher
conditions, with even tougher conditions if not accepted. The infamous
clunking fist.

It may be that the correct course is a campaign, through MPs and the
press, to make it obvious to all and sundry that this is another
unacceptable case of Gordon's Fist. This may be more effective in the
long term than appearing too militant. But entering a formal dispute
may be a good way of pointing out to everyone how unacceptable the
Fist has been.

The message is getting across to some extent. Nigel Hawkes made a
comment in the Times the other day about the Government "needlessly
picking a fight with GPs which it will win by dint of stamping hard."
This will not have gone unnoticed - and we might care to point it out
to our MPs. Clunking Gordon Brown is picking on our hard-working GPs
and stamping hard on them.

I think the best way forward now is to enter a formal dispute and cry
piteously for all to hear that Gordon is being nasty to us. If you
agree, write to your GPC rep and tell him or her.

Mike

--
Michael Leuty
Nottingham, UK

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager