Hi Trefor,
Is it too late for the ballot questions to be changed? I know it is a
wasted vote, but I would find it difficult to do anything but abstain
with such a crazy preference, the option being do you want to vote for
something really, really bad, or something really, really, really bad!
No wonder you are p****d foo by it all. It is a crazy ballot, with a
guaranteed win,win for this government whichever way it goes. Did they
write the ballot questions? As Laurie states our negotiators are not
stupid people, so why is this going forward as it is. I feel as though
I am sitting on the bridge of the Titanic seeing the iceberg
approaching and powerless to do anything about it. If things go
through as they are likely to, then I can see our 3-partner practice
no longer being viable.
Best wishes
Pau;l
On 13/02/2008, Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> It was a show of hands. You will have to ask them which way they voted.
>
> I voted against
>
> Trefor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of North Mike (F81717)
> Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH
> Sent: 13 February 2008 17:23Hi
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Abstention?
>
> Trefor - if all the GPC members who think this is wrong were also to
> resign, we would be left with all those who think it's fine - not what we
> need :-(
>
> Are we allowed to know which of our representatives voted which way? or is
> that taking democracy too far for them? How else can we form an opinion of
> whether we believe our representatives represent our views?
>
> Mike
>
> > Trefor Roscoe [[log in to unmask]]:
> > I am almost certainly not going to stand for re-election to GPC
> > because of all this.
>
> > It is crazy to ask the profession to express a preference for one or
> > other of two impositions that will damage General Practice.
>
--
Best Wishes
Paul Bromley
www.informatiks.com
Custom EMIS LV Software.
vuE | GPLabels | GPDocs | eGFRChecker
|