Paul Bromley wrote:
> Hardly optional though if we have a large chunk of cash deducted for
> not doing it.
Wrong assessment, and dangerous to you.
It seems to me to be somewhere in the neighbourhood of the sunk
investment fallacy.
You are thinking, for a moment, as though you were an employee on a salary.
A (large, not ideal, nearly singular) customer has decided not to carry
on buying something they used to.
Alas.
> If it is optional with no financial penalty then none of us would
> touch it.
If the rate offered for it is low then there is something else you can
do that earns more in the same time. Therefore you will do that.
If not then it comes down to whether you want the money - as a business.
--
A
|