Mark,
You're absolutely right. See the Australian Psychological Society's recent media release stating the psychology is the key to improving health. The link is http://www.psychology.org.au/news/media_releases/12Feb08/
It promotes individual intervention as the key to changing individual lifestyles. For example, "What and how much you eat and drink, whether or not you smoke or abuse other substances, how physically active you are, whether or not you manage stress, are all behaviours that are changeable and that's all pure psychology."
Lauren
---
Lauren Breen, PhD
Postdoctoral Research Scholar
Centre for Social Research
Edith Cowan University
________________________________
From: The UK Community Psychology Discussion List on behalf of Mark Burton
Sent: Wed 27/02/2008 4:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Anti depressants 'of little use'
Here is the link to the study
http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045
and to the University of Hull Press Release
http://www.hull.ac.uk/news/feb08/antidepressants.html
What interests me about this study is the issue of publication bias. By
including all unpublished data the effect can be evaluated properly - it
would seem that previous studies, including those used by NICE
systematically over-estimate the effect of the SSRIs.
It is also interesting that the difference between placebo and drug for
the most severely depressed people is attributed to a falling off of the
placebo effect rather than drug efficacy as such.
We might ask a) is there a similar effect with CBT - what are the
publication biases here? what do the unpublished studies tell us? and
b) since there is no equivalent to the FDA or equivalent for
psychotherapies there would seem to be no analogous dataset that could
be interrogated to reveal such an effect.
What is likely to happen as a result of theis study (led by a
psychologist) is an even greater emphasis on individual talking therapy
- so this study won't necessarily lead to more emphasis on social
interventions.
Mark
Elaine Douglas wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Just spotted this news item on the BBC website related to findings
> recently published from Hull.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7263494.stm
>
> Would this be an appropriate article for the list to add backing to the
> ineffectiveness of anti depressants? There were good efforts to get a
> statement out to the media on CBT recently. Perhaps something similar
> here would be good. Additionally, perhaps those more involved/aware (than
> myself) in the SUG might wish to get a statement going from there? I am
> willing to assist in the process.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Elaine
>
>
>
>
___________________________________
COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK.
To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML
For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator Rebekah Pratt on [log in to unmask] or Grant Jeffrey on [log in to unmask]
This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.
CRICOS IPC 00279B
___________________________________
COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK.
To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML
For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator Rebekah Pratt on [log in to unmask] or Grant Jeffrey on [log in to unmask]
|