JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  January 2008

PHD-DESIGN January 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Is all writing fiction?

From:

Gavin Melles <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Gavin Melles <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:19:47 +1100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (108 lines)

Dear Teena, Ken and others
I think Richard Rorty had a very good take on exactly some of the issues
that are at stake here, which avoids the kind of infinite regress or
self-destruct Ken points to. Accounts of power, society, institutions,
relations, people, Foucault's, Simone de Beuavoir's, Melvilles,
Machiavelli's, Nabokov's and also Orwell's have all achieved certain
(pragmatic) purposes in terms of informing us about how the world is
(and might be - although Nabokov thought Orwell was topical trash).
Realist historical accounts, films,  statistical records, can achieve
similar purposes - and it is ultimate purposes that are in point when we
wheel in pragmatism. One of the very negative consequences of relativism
(and this is NOT the case with pragmatism) is that the holocaust,
climate change, etc., become undecidable  and ultimately trivial
questions. What we want, surely, is the opportunity to consider how
personal stories, statistics, film, stills, other forms of research
might together contribute to demonstrating what went on so that the
death of millions or of the planet does not go unchallenged or
unabsolved since that kind of moral IS in point. Thus, reasonable,
valid, etc., might be exchanged for useful (for whatever it is we -
liberal democrats and others who share our vision of freedom and very
basic justice - want to achieve). Rorty often got into conversation with
the poststructuralists and other thinkers - Habermas, Derrida, Foucault
(and Proust, Wittgenstein, Davidson), that he admired for shaking things
up but certainly not for offering the final method and interpretation of
the world that mattered. Philosophy and Social Hope is a great read
about the democratic and political consequences of pragmatism.

Shortly before his death, he wrote a piece called "The Fire of Life,"
(published in the November 2007 issue of Poetry Magazine)[5], in which
he meditates on his diagnosis and the comfort of poetry. He concludes,
"I now wish that I had spent somewhat more of my life with verse. This
is not because I fear having missed out on truths that are incapable of
statement in prose. There are no such truths; there is nothing about
death that Swinburne and Landor knew but Epicurus and Heidegger failed
to grasp. Rather, it is because I would have lived more fully if I had
been able to rattle off more old chestnuts — just as I would have if I
had made more close friends." from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Rorty

Dr Gavin Melles
Lecturer, Research Degree Skills
Faculty of Design
Swinburne University of Technology
Mob (03) 0402927278
>>> Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]> 01/22/08 17:27 PM >>>
Dear Teena,

To me, the claim that "all writing is fiction" leads to an infinite 
regress. If all writing is fiction, then why is Foucauld's take on 
power relations any more reasonable or reliable than that of Simone 
de Beauvoir or Herman Melville?

If all writing is fiction, then why would we wish to bother with any 
account whatsoever? Why would any account be more useful or 
illuminating than any other?

If all writing is fiction, why would a post-structuralist account be 
more useful than an empiricist account or a cognitive account?

When we ask for an account of what people witness, hear, say, or 
experience, we ask for integrity and reliability, not "validity." 
This is not a matter of "proof." It is a matter of asking the author 
to describe what is said, a responsible account of what others say.

To argue that "all writing is fiction" is to that that we have no 
responsibility to the voices of those whose stories we recount. When 
we recount the voices of other speakers, the words that we report 
demand responsible reporting. This is not "proof," but responsibility.

Yours,

Ken

--

Teena Clerke wrote:

(1)

my intention was to provide an opening for discussion about design 
research epistemology without introducing the construct of 'gender', 
but by removing the actual bodies themselves. I saw this as a 
poststructuralistto see what people imagined design research might look like if either 
men or women were removed from its practice. This asks for an 
entirely different kind of imagining other than the binary of 
men/women. In a Foucauldian sense, power and knowledge are 
interrelated within the social relations between people and are 
(re)produced within discourses. So, I thought if you take out the 
bodies, what kind of discursive imagining would ensue?

(2)

Fiona talks about her embodied experiences in design research, 
sitting through meetings and listening to the various ways in design 
is perceived in a large faculty. I am curious to hear of others' 
personal experiences, and particularly welcome those not based on 
'proof'. In this call, I do not wish to debate 'validity' because 
from my epistemological position, all writing is fiction.

-- 

Ken Friedman
Professor

Dean, Swinburne Design
Swinburne University of Technology
Melbourne, Australia

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager