JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  December 2007

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION December 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Climates and Wood availability [was Re: [M-R] St. Joseph misunderstood]

From:

rochelle altman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval religious culture <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:25:01 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (327 lines)

medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

Hi, C.

> > >From: rochelle altman <[log in to unmask]>
> > >[excellent topographical description of the 
> Galilee/Nazareth/Jerusalem area
>ruthlessly snipped]
>
> > Coming from you, that's high praise. :-)
>
>i have a strong interest in 12th c. Nazareth (i know a Chartrain sculptor who
>worked there, before the Salad-Inn put a stop to that foolishness), so you got
>my attention up-front.

Then you should be interested in Nazareth's position -- a way station 
between the mountains and the valleys and the inland lake/sea. (It is 
freshwater, after all.) Therefore, not simply a poor little farming 
village. It was a trader's village; a meeting ground between the 
highlanders and the lowlanders. Of course, they had artisans and workshops.

>  >>Conifers, in general, yield lumber good for chairs, tools, shelves, doors,
>door-frames, bed-frames, etc....  also are limited in the width of the lumber
>and are not the most durable of woods.
>
> >>>durable enough (if kept out of the weather), but knotty as hell and, thus,
>difficult to do fine work in.
>
> > And that's why so many antique chairs, etc., from the general area are (1)
>with very little shaping -- straight backs, legs, and frames -- and (2)
>painted.
>
>no doubt.
>
>and no doubt ordinary furnature for ordinary folks was pretty simple (the very
>possession of a chair, of any sort, might disqualify one from being
>"ordinary").

Nope, not if you see the style -- pretty much boxes -- only with 
square legs. Stools are easy enough to make from scrap lumber or 
fallen tree branches with enough heft -- then you got
round legs with a box or circular or flat plate on top. Of course, 
not too surprisingly, there were stone benches and other stone 
seating. (Stone benches are not particularly comfortable without a 
cushions [kariyot] of some sort -- and cushion/pillow makers were 
around.) Stone tables, too.

>still, the Upper Classes would have demanded furniture.

Of course the upper classes had fine furniture -- not the same thing, 
though, is it.

>and the Egyptians, for all their lack of wood (good or otherwise) were --as
>best we can judge from the tomb survivals) *master* cabinetmakers, joiners,
>whateverthahellyouwannacallit.

They sure were -- but the Pharoahs could import whatever they 
wanted... including skilled woodworkers. They had guilds, too.

>there must have been *thousands* of small (and large) shrines of this sort:
>
>http://www.suziemanley.com/march/tut_nest.htm
>
>chairs
>
>http://daphne.palomar.edu/mhudelson/WorksofArt/02Egyptian/2121.html
>
>(there's another one from Tut's tomb, not gilded, but quite wonderfully worked
>an marvelously finished; i don't know where it's wood came from, sub-sahara,
>perhaps.)

Or Phoenicia or Crete or Cyprus -- lots of trading in this triangle 
as far back as the fourth millennium.

>these were so common, apparently, you can pick one up today for a Song on
>eBay
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/Ancient-Egyptian-TUTANKHAMUN-THRONE-JEWELRY-BOX_W0QQitemZ180198445327QQihZ008QQcategoryZ10911QQcmdZViewItem

Yeah, and if from Tut's tomb, and not a replica, then an illegally 
exported item at that. Better not let Hawassi know -- he's even 
trying to copyright the Pyramids now. (LOL)

>chariot wheels (not all that easy to design and construct), including a few
>i've seen which show an absolutely *brilliant* solution to the problem of how
>to solve the hub/spoke/wheel problem: the spokes were made out of half-round
>pieces of wood which were (heat/steam)*bent* at acute angle and lashed
>together two at a time, flat side to flat side, mortised into the fellees,
>comming together at the hub.

Chariot makers and wheel-wrights were specialists, they were not 
general carpenters.

>as far as i'm concerned, in spite of the *massive* loses of exemplars over the
>millennia, woodwork of this quality did not simply "suck itself out of its own
>fingers," and implies *extensive* experience, over a long, long period of
>time.

Of course. From what's been turning up recently, it seems that all 
this expertise with copper (and the things are beautiful and 
intricately designed) from the chalcolithic and later -- appears in 
Europe and the Middle-East after the dispersal of the farming 
communities around the Black Sea when the Mediterranean changed the 
Black Sea from fresh-water to salt (yep, Noah's Flood). Axe heads had 
wooden handles; the beds were wood-framed. You would have to have had 
equivalent expertise with wood.

 From wall paintings and pottery there seemed also to have been 
chariots by the 4th millennium-- wood framed with reed matting 
filling in the sides.

>with no native wood close by, to speak of.
>
> > > >> So, there was plenty of wood -- and work -- available for a jointer, a
>cabinet-maker, but not much for a general carpenter. ...the dominant building
>material was stone.... Wood was used in door and window frames, doors,
>furniture, shelving, and household items. etc.
>
> >>>and for roofs.
>
> >>the construction of which would fall to the carpenter.<
>
> > True -- if the roofs had wood cross beams.
>
>you mean beams running across the building's width?
>
>one way to do it.
>
>esp. for large buildings.
>
>more modest houses could have had a long ridge "beam", onto which the rafters
>were attached, running down to the walls.

No. No ridge beams, no rafters. Apparently stretched and treated hide 
or, as in Egypt, woven reed matting, or, as in Mesopotamia and 
Westwards, tunnel roofs.

Lots of tunnel roofs still around. We do know about the Egyptian reed 
matting, but stretched hide depends entirely on pictures on walls and 
pottery. Nothing much left of roofs of modest dwellings from 
antiquity, only foundations.

And Chris, in Egypt, the reed huts of the lower classes were narrow; 
in Mesopotamia, the mud and straw brick huts had thick walls and 
narrow rooms. In Greece, modest dwellings had absolutely 
claustrophobic rooms -- even just standing outside and looking in at 
an abandoned early AD house on the upper Plaka was repellent. Of 
course, in Egypt we have temples. To the East we find foundations, 
stairs, and lower parts of walls of the luxury buildings. Remnants of 
arched stone roofs did turn up from ca. fourth millennium in Mesopotamia.

>a post or column in the middle of the room would help that ridge beam out --or
>it could be spliced ("fished") together from two pieces (the "evolution" of
>middlevil splice joints is laid out in particular detail in the books of Cecil
>Hewett which i mentioned previously on this thread).
>
> >No wood in the roofs in the older plastered-stone houses (I've been inside
>one that dates to the 12th-century.)
>
>roofs made out of stone?

Yes. But as I said, that was a luxury house. Had two domed rooms and 
a luxurious entry courtyard (behind marvelously carved double gates) 
full of flowers and trees. As far as I could determine (couldn't 
exactly go around gouging the ceilings), the roof was made of thin 
stone slabs that met in the middle of the stone cross-beams. I 
presume over that there was impregnated reed matting in layers.

>in modest houses?

As I said, to the West, modest houses may have had either reed 
matting, stretched hides or tunnel roofs.... In Mesopotamia, farm 
workers probably had matting; however, the artisan and other middle 
classes most likely would have had tunnel roofs of straw and mud 
bricks that rested on and overhung the tops of the walls. Essentially 
a full-sized kerf for rain run-off.

> >We were talking about wood, so I didn't  mention that the stone from the
>Judean Hills is sandstone, chalky and soft (you can "inscribe" it with a
>fingernail) and it's soft enough to be not difficult to cut cross-beams out
>of.
>
>i'm having trouble picturing a stone "cross-beam" --spanning a 10+ foot
>space...

You have to see it to believe it. It was extraordinary. Looked a 
great deal like our modern concrete cross-beams -- but it was of stone.

Then, you are imagining rooms in ordinary (not luxury) housing to be 
much larger than they were. Five or six feet wide would be more like 
it. Length, though, is another story.

> >Flat roofs
>
>flat *stone* roofs?
>
>i'd like to live long enough to see one of those...
>
> >themselves may have been matting that was tarred (Dead Sea not far away) to
>water-proof. And domes (of whatever size) are stone -- corbelled and
>plastered, inside and out.
>
>domes?
>
>in "ordinary" (lower or even middle class) domestic architecture?

Domes usually were on the homes of the rich; but when you find a dome 
on a modestly sized house without a courtyard...you have to think 
artisan or merchant.

Then there were, and are, all those tunnel churches -- which is 
merely an elongated, instead of round, dome -- an arch -- atop a 
typical narrow room. Most definitely a stone roof supported by  stone 
side walls.  No interior columns. You see these tunnel churches all 
over the Cyclades. Some are tiny 4-5 person tunnel churches perched 
on a mountain top; others are "large" 25-30 person churches in populated areas.

Tunnel churches imitate the construction of Mesopotamian houses and 
temples and clearly were also around in the Coastal areas of the 
Mediterranean. I have photos of some of those tunnel churches from 
Greece. (One from the 3rd to 4th-century was right across the street 
from the apartment in Chalandri behind a modern concrete, 
pseudo-Byzantine. I couldn't imagine why all those tourist buses 
stopped at that very ordinary pseudo-Byzantine church, so one day I 
wandered around the back and -- lo, there was this ancient tunnel 
church.) I even have one photo of a tunnel synagogue. But, I have no 
way to make them available on the web.

> >The arch, corbel and other developments, has been used in 
> construction in the
>general area since the fourth millennium.
>
>i've got no trouble with those, just don't see them being used all that much
>in common domestic architecture.

Why not? Easy enough to build -- when the rooms are narrow. Whether 
out of straw and mud bricks or cut stone. In fact, if you ever get a 
chance to visit Thera (aka Santorini), you will find modest domestic 
buildings of stone with stone tunnel roofs all over the Island. 
Plastered and white-washed, of course.

> > Buildings in Petra (the rose-red city built of stone) were cut into the
>rock.
>
>are their *houses* in Petra?

Yes and no.

>i thought that all those spectauclar carved "caves" (i wouln't call them
>"buildings" --faux buildings, maybe) were tombs.

Houses of the dead. Yes. -- just look at the entries. Greek 
funeraries of the Classical period have the statues encased in the 
entry to a temple. Note that a temple was called a house of god.
There is, also a monastery cut into the rock. That red rock is also 
soft sandstone.

>in any event, perhaps we can agree that Petra is something of a One-Of?

No, we can't. There are monasteries in the Egypt that were, and are, 
cut out of the "living rock."

> >No wood in the roofs.
>
>no "roofs," in caves.
>
>caves come with ready-made "roofs" --even man excavated caves.

Sure.

> >(And precious little wood available in that area.) In Egypt, the general
>population built their houses of reed stalks bound together for support posts
>and woven reed mats for roofing.
>
>as in the Land of the Two Rivers.

No, in the land of two rivers the modest houses were built of mud and 
straw bricks and probably covered by a tunnel roof -- except for 
actual laborers.  As long as the tops of the bricks were protected, 
the housing stood.

>but, not much in the way of reeds, in Palestine, i assume.

Reeds all around the Sea of Galilee. Reeds around oases. Reeds used 
for pens. One end of the Sea was a swamp -- a malarial swamp. All 
types of reeds -- fat woody ones, skinny weaving ones, round ones, 
flat ones, etc.

> >Again, no wood and no need for general carpenters.
>
>Viday Soupra, re Egyptians.

Nope, those were not general carpenters; those were specialists. Some 
marvelous chairs and cabinets from Pharonic tombs. Chariot builders 
were specialists. And wheelwrights were another specialty group of 
woodworkers. None of these specialists can be called general carpenters.

> > Today, of course, it's poured concrete and concrete block -- much cheaper
>than a stone mason.
>
>yes, the damned Romans ruined it all.

Well, the Egyptians had their own form of concrete -- that's how they 
built the pyramids and apparently some of their temples. It looks 
like stone, but it's cast Egyptian concrete (see the pyramids). It's 
not all stone, though they did some remarkable things with stone for statues.

Wouldn't surprise me if the Romans got their concept of concrete from Egypt.

>c

Cheers,

Rochelle

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager