JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION  December 2007

LIS-PROFESSION December 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: CILIP announces new Board of Trustees

From:

Bruce Royan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bruce Royan <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:24:42 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (182 lines)

Hi Frances

I think a lot of the "eerie silence" from the new Trustees is that many of
them will not be members of lis-profession, and will still expect comments
on the CILIP election (and indeed on CILIP issues more generally) to be
posted on the CILIP Communities.

I have already asked to raise the issue of the poor election out-turn and
the non-receipt of ballot papers to be discussed at the December Council
Meeting. But if anyone wants to raise anything else, either with the new or
old Council, could they please do us the courtesy of raising it in the forum
that was set up for these issues?   

As the List-Owner of LIS-PROFESSION has recently pointed out:

"This list is no longer a CILIP list and has not been for over a year.
There's little point in advising CILIP about what you think they need to do
if you aren't prepared to use their preferred communication outlets."

Best

Bruce
  

******************************************
Prof Bruce Royan   www.concurrentcomputing.co.uk
41 Greenhill Gardens, Edinburgh, EH10 4BL,   UK
+44 131 4473151                    +44 77 1374 4731
******************************************
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Library and Information Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Frances Hendrix
Sent: 07 December 2007 13:29
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CILIP announces new Board of Trustees

 Here we go again, more infor from the members and maybe some lapsed
members

BUT eerily silent from the new trustees apart from one or 2 postings
on Cilip Communities (such an inhospitably thing to use., but our stuff,
or rather most of it has got there. But one new trustee who doesn't get
it yet. Thinks we haven't made suggestions!) 

1.I've been following this with some interest.  I did vote: I also think
12 too unwieldy a number. About 8 of the names were familiar - but
that's only because I've moved in different sectors. 
I favour 'benevolent dictatorship', in that I have found smaller groups
tend to produce results, while large groups are merely talking shops. I
heartily agree with the comment on 'missing skills': I have been saying
this for at least 5 years; but I am not in any position of authority or
influence upon curricula.
I don't log on to 'communities' - I find email an easier option. 
The piece in the Independent should be a start; and I will watch the
Trustees with respect. Trying to turn around an ailing body, while the
economy quietly goes into instability (where one of the first casualties
in any recession is information management; remember the 90s?), will be
interesting.

2.I have been most interested to see the recent correspondence. Although
professional qualifications are still recognised and valued in my
authority, I am aware that they are not elsewhere. A recent piece in the
Gazette recently summed up the current views -  so when a respected
person is questioning professional status it does make you wonder why we
bother.

Society at large does not know the difference between a librarian, a
library assistant or a library attendant. We recently advertised for a
professionally qualified librarian and of 10 applicants, only one was
qualified. It does not occur to people that there is such a thing - they
would not apply for a job as a surveyor or town planner without the
appropriate qualifications. 

On one hand CILIP has failed to assert the professional status of
librarians (though to be honest I think it is a battle they are never
going to win, given the image of librarians and the prevailing ignorance
of the fact that there are such things as qualifications and charter
ship) and on the other hand they are making entrants to the professional
go through a prolonged and off-putting process in order to charter. It's
hard to motivate people to go through all this in order to gain a status
no-one values - the only point is the pay rise to the next salary scale.

CILIP would say that the point of all the chartership training is to
enable us to tell the world we are professionals, but as no-one is
listening, are we just kidding ourselves

3.Many thanks for raising the issue of lack of votes, and for passing on
some of the comments you have received. 

I would like to add my frustrations to the list! I moved house last
December and despite phone calls to Cilip and changing my address on my
profile on their website, it was May before my Update and Gazette
started arriving at my new address. And, you guessed it, my voting
papers were also sent to my old address, and it was too late to vote by
the time I received them. I feel that this kind of admin error, from a
professional organisation that many of us pay lots of money to every
year, is unacceptable. I feel that Cilip has very little regard for the
individual member and this may go some way to explain the lacklustre
attitude at the moment. I am however, proud to be a librarian, and have
recently started to attend meetings of my local UC&R group to become
actively involved in promoting networking amongst the profession.

And yes, I did vote for the councillors - I voted for anyone who had
been involved with public libraries, and anyone who shared my concerns
about the changing status of librarians -though there weren't very many
of them

4.
Sounds as if you have hit a nerve given the amount of replies you are
getting. I think it is definitely worthwhile publishing comments
anonymously. I would not have replied if I thought I could be
identified.

f
-----Original Message-----
From: CILIP's University, College & Research Special Interest Group
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Johnson Gareth
Sent: 06 December 2007 10:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FW: CILIP announces new Board of Trustees

For information

G
 CILIP : the Chartered Institute of Library and Information
Professionals
> 7 Ridgmount St, London WC1E 7AE.
> 
> Tel: 020 7255 0500
> Textphone: 020 7255 0505
> Fax: 020 7255 0501
> Mailto:[log in to unmask]
> 
> News from CILIP
> 6 December 2007
> 
> CILIP announces new Board of Trustees
> 
> CILIP Members have elected the twelve Trustees to serve on its
reformed Council, which takes effect from 1 January 2008.
> 
> They are: Chris Armstrong, Judy Broady-Preston, Paul Clarke, Veronica
Fraser, Isabel Hood, Ayub Khan, Dion Lindsay, Nigel Macartney, Liz
Maclachlan, Caroline Moss-Gibbons, Diana Nutting, and Bruce Royan.
> 
> Bob McKee, Chief Executive of CILIP, said "CIILP has been working hard
on Governance issues over the last two years. The twelve Trustees were
elected from a strong list of candidates. They will drive CILIP forward
over the coming years".
> 
> 
> Contact: Daniel Sabel, Governance Manager Tel:020 7255 0656
> 
> 
> Notes for Editors
> 
> CILIP: the Chartered Institute of Library and Information
Professionals is the leading professional body for librarians,
information specialists and knowledge managers.  It forms a community of
around 36,000 people engaged in library and information work, of whom
around 21,000 are CILIP members and around 15,000 are regular customers
of CILIP Enterprises.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses, which could damage your
computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
legislation.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager