> 2. The number (or a very direct relationship to that number such as a
> multiple) must appear more often than can be accounted for by pure chance.
> 3. OR, there must be compelling evidence that the design naturally would
> have tended toward another number and that the designer struggled to
> achieve that exact number. (e.g. they ran out of space and had to fit the
> remainder in to obtain the exact number)
Well one could suggest that it was intended. Based on a scaled plan
of the holes sent to me, it looks like it was laid out as per a sketch I
One really needs to work with survey coordinates for each of the holes to
see if this is really accurate. I sure found it an interesting exercise.
Peter A. Kincaid
Fredericton, NB, Canada