JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PSCI-COM Archives


PSCI-COM Archives

PSCI-COM Archives


PSCI-COM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PSCI-COM Home

PSCI-COM Home

PSCI-COM  November 2007

PSCI-COM November 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Invitation to tender: Girls in Physics evaluation

From:

Catherine Aldridge <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

psci-com: on public engagement with science

Date:

Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:48:56 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (177 lines)

Invitation to tender for an evaluation of Girls in Physics: effective
interventions


Background
Girls are under-represented in physics after the age of 16. In 2005 physics
was the 12th most popular A-level in the UK, with 28,119 candidates. Of
these, 21,922 were male, making physics the sixth most-popular A-level
subject for boys; for girls, physics was the 19th most common A-level
choice. Of those who took physics A-level, 34% achieved an A grade. In 2005
only 14% of girls who were awarded an A* or A for GCSE Double Award Science
or Physics sat A-level physics. In other words there are a very substantial
number of girls who have the ability to do well at physics but who are
choosing not to study the subject post-16.
In 2005, the Institute of Physics commissioned a review of the research to
try and understand the causes of this problem. As a result of this research
a guide for teachers was produced. In 2006, a number of the Science Leaning
Centres used this guide as the basis for working with schools to tackle the
under-representation of girls in physics. Thanks to funding from the
Department of Children, Schools and Families, this work has now been
extended and expanded to enable 100 schools to be involved in the project.
Seven Science Learning Centres will work with up to 100 schools in total
helping them to review the current situation with regard to the
participation of girls in physics in their own institution and to develop
action research projects to address the issues that are identified. It is
anticipated that the research projects will be clustered into the following
areas:
•
School Culture: whole school ethos and support from Senior Management.
•
Teaching and learning strategies: shaping physics curriculum and pedagogies
to be more relevant and inclusive.
•
Classroom management: using mixed and/or single gender groups within
lessons.
•
Careers education and guidance: strategies for engaging teachers and IAG
specialists or providing careers-focused teaching and learning strategies.
•
Progression: exposing girls to more pathways for studying physics.
•
Workforce: exposing more pupils to specialist physics teaching.


The work
The Science Learning Centres and the Institute of Physics wish to contract
suitable experts to undertake a rigorous evaluation of the success of the
interventions that schools will be undertaking as part of this project.
We anticipate that the work will have three interconnecting strands:
i) Developing a framework that identifies key questions for the evaluation.
This will involve identifying and measuring key indicators for the areas
identified above.
ii) Collecting and collating the results from individual schools; this will
include baseline measures as well as progress on the agreed indicators. The
intention is to produce a synthesis of the impact of the individual
interventions to enable other schools to build on the work carried out
during the project.
iii) Working with schools and teachers to enable them to measure the impact
of the individual interventions in their schools.



Deliverables
•
Regular progress reports to the management group, likely to be on a monthly
basis.
•
The development of workshops/visits for individual schools to develop the
indicators and methods that schools can use for measuring them.
•
Interim report to include contextual information about the schools, the
current situation with regard to the participation of girls in physics and
baseline measures of selected indicators.
•
A final full report for publication by the funders. The full report will be
made available to schools and others in a form that enables them to build on
the lessons learnt during the project. Therefore it will need to be
accessible for the teaching community in schools and colleges.
•
At least one article based on the study published in a recognised academic
journal.
•
At least one presentation at a meeting or conference involving the science
education community – to be agreed with the management group.
The information provided in the study and reports to the Science Learning
Centres and the IOP, and the rights to all other output, shall become the
property of the Science Learning Centres and Institute of Physics.



Resources available
The budget for this project up to £30,000. There is the possibility of some
extended funding to explore the sustainability of the individual projects in
schools.



Tender requirements and assessment
Proposals should clearly and fully demonstrate:
•
capability at undertaking this type of work.
•
methodology to be adopted.
•
a work plan with milestones and deliverables.
•
details of personnel who will work on the study, highlighting the project
manager who will become the point of contact for all correspondence.
•
overall costs and the basis on which the fee is calculated, including main
areas of work and daily rates of the project team.
•
two referees who would be able to provide recommendations as to ability to
undertake this project.
The selection of the successful proposal will be the decision of the
representatives of the partners. Tenders will be evaluated on the basis of
the following criteria:
•
Intellectual ability and understanding of the funders’ needs. We expect
proposals to show a full appreciation of the objectives of this study,
provide clear evidence that all the points raised in this document have been
addressed, and use their own knowledge, experience and creative thinking to
raise any other points of relevance.
•
Technical ability. Methodologies, particularly those involving original
research, should be current, and withstand peer review from external
advisors to this project. Previous work and the skills of the project team
will also be used to assess technical ability.
•
Value for money. This will be assessed in comparison with other tenders
using daily rates, quality of staff, and extent of outputs for total cost.
We expect realistic and cost-effective financial estimates for the project
that include all expenses.
•
Management ability. We will use the work plan, skills of personnel and
evidence of previous projects to find proven ability to perform within the
desired parameters, and deliver the desired results.


Timetable
Organisations or individuals wishing to tender for this project should
register their interest by email to [log in to unmask]
Proposals should be no more than 10 sides of A4. They should include CVs of
not more that two pages per person of relevant staff.
Proposals should be sent by post to Angus Skilling, National Science
Learning Centre, University of York, YO10 5DD or [log in to unmask] by 13
December 2007.
Faxed or late tenders will not be accepted.
Tenderers may be required to attend a meeting on 20 December 2007 prior to
the award of any contract. Tenderers will be contacted on 17 December 2007
if required to attend this meeting. Reasonable travel expenses for this will
be covered.
Tenderers will be informed of the outcome of the selection process by 21
December 2007. Feedback can be requested.
Interim report should be submitted by 30 April 2008.
Final full report should be submitted by 31 October 2008.
Journal article and presentation at meeting should be completed by 31
December 2008.




The national network of Science Learning Centres is a joint initiative
by the Department for Children, Schools and Families and the Wellcome Trust.

**********************************************************************
1. To suspend yourself from the list, whilst on leave, for example,
send an email to mailto:[log in to unmask] with the following message:
set psci-com nomail
2. To resume email from the list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message: set psci-com mail
3. To leave psci-com, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message:
leave psci-com
4. Further information about the psci-com discussion list, including list archive, can be found at the list web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/psci-com.html
5. The psci-com gateway to internet resources on science communication and science and society can be found at http://psci-com.ac.uk
6. To contact the Psci-com list owner, please send an email to mailto:[log in to unmask]
**********************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager