Hi Carolyn
To help with this question I feel it is important to know quite a lot
more about the way the research has been planned prior to the conduct of
the interviews. For example: what was the sampling strategy that led to
the selection of the people who were interviewed; how was the topic
guide or interview schedule developed, what framework has been used to
develop the study etc? I suggest that all these things should be
informing the way that she chooses to analyse the data.
I think it is likely that it would be more helpful for her to look at
all of the interview data and identify the major themes but without more
information about the study it is difficult to say.
I think Jennifer Mason's book provides a really good overview and might
be a useful resource: Mason J. (2002) Qualitative researching. Sage
Publications.
I hope this is helpful?
Joyce
--
Joyce Marshall
Lecturer (Midwifery)
Department of Health Sciences
Area 4, Seebohm Rowntree Building
Heslington
York YO10 5DD
Telephone (01904) 321831
Fax (01904) 321820
Email [log in to unmask]
Roth, Carolyn wrote:
> Dear all, one of my MSc students is conducting a study using 5 interviews (ranging from 15 minutes to 1 hr) which were conducted in Greek and have been translated by her into English. She wants to validate the translations and has asked another bilingual friend to back-translate into Greek.
>
> She wanted some advice about how much she needs to look at. I've suggested several small sections from each interview, 'randomly' selected.
>
> I wondered if anyone had experience or knows any commentary on this.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Carolyn Roth
> Senior Lecturer
> Midwifery Department City
> Community & Health Sciences
> 24 Chiswell Street London EC1Y 4TY
>
> Tel 0207 040 5869 Fax 0207 040 5866
>
>
|