JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MANDARIN-CHINESE-TEACHING Archives


MANDARIN-CHINESE-TEACHING Archives

MANDARIN-CHINESE-TEACHING Archives


MANDARIN-CHINESE-TEACHING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MANDARIN-CHINESE-TEACHING Home

MANDARIN-CHINESE-TEACHING Home

MANDARIN-CHINESE-TEACHING  November 2007

MANDARIN-CHINESE-TEACHING November 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Chinese and Japanese Edexcel exams

From:

MTATE <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Mandarin Chinese Teaching <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:52:28 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (289 lines)

Dear Sophia and anyone else interested,

There are definite differences in the present Edexcel exams for GCSE, 
which your friend's school may be unaware of and have therefore set the 
challenge of Grade A in GCSE Chinese in a year.  In my experience, this 
would be extremely difficult.

Apologies to anyone if you think I'm teaching youto suck eggs, but, 
briefly...

Japanese has two phonetic scripts (hiragana and katakana) as well as 
kanji (characters).  You can get away with only writing in the scripts 
at GCSE level.  

The biggest difference in the exams for the two languages at the 
moment is in the writing papers.  Just a few examples; Q1 in Japanese 
asks the candidate to write a list of 5 items in a certain category (eg 
things in your school bag, or things you talk on holiday).  You can 
write anything within reason to achieve the marks.  Q1 in Chinese asks 
you to write the characters for specific pictures.  Sometimes you need 
to provide verbs and nouns, sometimes measure words too, but always 
specified by the picture stimulus - no choice.

Q4 in Japanese always has two choices for the extended writing.  
Questions differ slightly year by year, but the themes are almost 
always the same - either a descriptive piece or a piece focussing on 
the past tense.  you have a reasonble chance at preparing students very 
well for this.  Q4 in Chinese is one question (no choice) and could be 
on anything - there is no link year by year.  This means that if your 
candidate doesn't understand the question, they don;t have another 
choice that they may be able to answer.

Q3 in Japanese gives candidates a chance to get quite a few marks just 
for getting the letter / postcard format correct (date, greetings, 
name, etc).  In Chinese sometimes you respond to an Email, sometimes a 
note, sometimes a letter.  Emphasis is not placed on letter-writing 
skills and knowledge at all.

These are just some of the reasons why it is easier to gain a higher 
grade at GCSE in Japanese than in Chinese.

Also, because Japanese uses phonetic scripts, when candidates read 
text out loud they can often understand the meaning from their 
listening skills, but the same does not apply to Chinese since there is 
no link between the sounds and the written characters.  Another reason 
that it is easier in Japanese is, as you mentioned Sophia, there are a 
lot of 'loan words' taken from English, so if you hear them you can 
easily guess their meaning.  There are some in Chinese, but far fewer 
than in Japanese at this level of language learning.

I hope this helps explain the disparity in the exams a little.

Michelle

----Original Message----
From: [log in to unmask]
Date: 29-Nov-2007 12:32
To: 
Subj: Re: Mission Impossible?
Dear Mandarin Teachers,     I'm so glad this topic "Mission 
Impossible" has come up. As a matter of fact, someone I know dearly 
(lives near London area) is been challenged by thier Head of Modern 
Languages about the time taken for pupils to achieve GCSE Chinese for 
grade A in one year!!!      The Head said if their Japanese teacher has 
claimed and achieved that a small group of high achievers year 11 
students (non-Japanese backgrround) took Japanesse in one year (2 hours 
a week after school activity) and got their GCSE all grade A, so why 
cannot the Chinese teachers offer the same package. The Japanese 
teacher also claimed that there is a shortcut to achieve that, i.e. 
teach them a lot of exam skills and memorising wordlists and do loads 
and loads of past papers. I told them that the Japanese has a lot of 
"loan words" similar to the Western languages, therefore can be picked 
up by English speakers quicker than
 picking up the Chinese/characters.      Would any of you have other 
insights and stronger points - my friend doesn't want to push or cram 
in the students too much but the school wants to use "one year for GCSE 
Chinese" as a selling point. Please help!!! Thank you.     Kind 
regards,     Sophia
george zhiyuzhao <[log in to unmask]> wrote:      .hmmessage 
P  {  margin:0px;  padding:0px  }  body.hmmessage  {  FONT-SIZE: 10pt;  
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma  }    in my school plan, my students who are british 
students without any chinese knowledge are going to take GCSE within 
two years. time is not enough but still possible having good result in 
two years.
 
so, be confident. 
 
george
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:56:04
 +0000
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Mission Impossible?
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> I would say it depends very much on the students' ability, 
commitment 
> and timetabled hours as to how possible it is for them to achieve 
good 
> grades at GCSE. If they have no Chinese background, but are 
committed 
> and willing to put in a lot of effort independently, reviewing 
> characters regularly, then it is not impossible for them to do well 
at 
> this level.
> 
> We teach all non-Chinese pupils at KLB School from Y7 to Y13. The 
> students opt to take the language and are generally very 
enthusiastic 
> and willing to learn. Mandarin shares the same curriculum time (10%) 
as 
> all of the other languages - 4 hours a fortnight in Y7, 5 hours in 
Y8, 
> 6 hours in Y11. 
> 
> Our experience has shown that with 5 years of lessons, very able
 and 
> committed pupils can achieve the higher grades, and less well 
committed 
> pupils achieve lower grades, in line with the amount of effort they 
put 
> in.
> 
> Michelle
> 
> ----Original Message----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Date: 29-Nov-2007 08:18
> To: 
> Subj: Re: Mission Impossible?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
> o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
> w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
> shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I have five non-native students taking
> GCSE in 2004 after three years from year 9 &amp;#8211; year 11 and 
four 
> achieved A*,
> one was one percent from A*. I have twelve students
 going to take GCSE 
> this
> coming summer and I expect them to do very well. The students have 
two 
> and half
> hours of lesson time each week and it should be enough to bring 
anyone
> non-natives to GCSE level, in my opinion. We use GCSE for Chinese. 
> We are a little too negative ourselves,
> sometimes!
> 
> Yan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> Mandarin Chinese Teaching
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of ru 
lan
> Sent: 2007年11月28日 22:07
> To:
> [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Mission Impossible?
> 
> 
> Hello Everyone,
> 
> My school is planning to introduce Mandarin up to GCSE level. I was 
> asked if
> I could take Year 9 pupils from beginner's level to GCSE in 3 to 3.5
> years. My initial response is it will be very difficult and it 
might 
>
 be
> impossible even the kids are very bright (a selective school with 
very
> outstanding GCSE and A Level results). At the moment I am 
> investigating if this
> is a difficult mission but achievable, or simply an impossible
> mission. 
> 
> As far as I know, it normally takes around 4 to 5 years to take 
> beginners
> to GCSE level. Kids from a Chinese background can take
> shorter time while non-native speakers will take longer. Definitely,
> I will get more teaching hours (at least 4 lessons per week) and 
> select
> students based on their language capability, enthusiasm and study 
> skills. I
> will also try to keep the class size to around 10.
> 
> Could you please voice your opinion? 
> 
> I would also like to know how GCSE Mandarin is taught in your 
school 
> in terms
> of years taken, number of lessons, selection of students, class 
size,
 
> text
> books etc.
> 
> Thank you for your help!
> 
> Lan Ru
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger Get it now! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message contains confidential information solely for its 
intended 
> recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, please inform 
us 
> immediately by email to [log in to unmask] If you 
are 
> not an intended recipient you must delete this email, and all 
copies 
> thereof, and may not forward it or otherwise disclose its contents 
to 
> any third party. For further information please visit us at www.
> cheltladiescollege.org.
> The Cheltenham Ladies' College is incorporated by Royal Charter and 
is 
> a Charity. Registration No. 311722 Our address is Bayshill Road, 
> Cheltenham, Gloucestershire GL50 3EP
>
 
> 
> 
> 
> 
..............................................................................................................................
> Michelle Tate
> Head of Oriental Languages
> Katharine Lady Berkeley's School
> Wotton-under-Edge
> Glos. GL12 8RB
> 
> Tel: 01453-842227
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> ..

    Your smile counts. The more smiles you share, the more we donate. 
Join in! 
&#32;Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.
yahoo.com 


..............................................................................................................................
Michelle Tate
Head of Oriental Languages
Katharine Lady Berkeley's School
Wotton-under-Edge
Glos. GL12 8RB

Tel: 01453-842227
Email: [log in to unmask]
..

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
September 2003
August 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager