And the headnote in the Norton is pretty good too! So is the
discussion by ALP and P. Cheney in our MLA collection of essays on
teaching shorter Elizabethan poems. That tooting is the sound of me
blowing my own horn. Anne P.
On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:25 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Richard McCabe's Penguin edition of the Shorter Poems (1999) is no
> longer new, but his headnote to the Amoretti & Epithalamion
> provides a good digest of critical opinion and a fairly
> comprehensive listing of the critics / scholars included in his
> bibliography.
>
> Jon Q.
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Joel Davis <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> I'm also interested in David's question -- especially stuff that's
>> reasonably accessible to bright undergraduates, like Germaine's SE
>> article.
>> Joel
>>
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2007, at 4:54 PM, David L. Miller wrote:
>>
>>> I'd be interested to know what listmembers consider to be the best
>>> published criticism on the Amoretti (or the Amoretti-and-
>>> Epithalamion).
>>> What do you recommend most enthusiastically?
>>>
>>> D
>>
>> Joel B. Davis
>> Assistant Professor
>> Department of English
>> Stetson University
>> 421 N. Woodland Blvd. Unit 8300
>> DeLand, FL 32723
>> 386.822.7724
>>
>>
|