JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  September 2007

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING September 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: California Video at the Getty Center

From:

Glenn Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Glenn Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:08:52 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (41 lines)

Hi everyone,

I'm currently organizing an exhibition about the history of video art in California, opening at the J. Paul Getty Museum in March of 2008. With 58 artists and a mix of single-channel video and installations, sound has obviously been a major obstacle.  Many of our galleries have 22-foot ceilings, and California building/earthquake safety codes requires walls going to that height to be 3-feet thick, so small rooms have not been an option without creating something that feels like a fortress maze.

We're exhibiting most single-channel videos on monitors.  Each monitor will play sound at a relatively low volume, and it will also have headphones for viewers who want to be more immersed.  We've integrated audio with our seating, so that each seat is adjacent to a post that has two headphone (with volume control) as well as two jacks allowing viewers to bring their own headphones to the exhibition and plug in. Label and didactic information are also located on this post, so viewers do not need to walk up to each monitor to find it.

For this exhibition, sound has often dictated my choice of works, and their groupings.  For instance, one gallery contains performance works primarily containing ambient sound (grunts and thuds), and works in this area are able to be exhibited much more closely together than elsewhere, and the mix of sounds somewhat amplifies the impact of the works.  However, this also excluded performative works involving speech, which are now located in "nooks" divided off by large hanging pieces of felt, allowing viewers to isolate themselves a little more.

For room-sized installations, we are often embedding multiple (6 or more) speakers at ear height around the room, which allows the overall volume level to be kept lower.  For an enormous gallery filled with multiple projections and installations, I only chose works that were silent or with ambient sound.

We are also creating a "Video Study Room," which contains of all the single-channel works on view elsewhere in the exhibition, which gives visitors an alternate way to view the works.  They can sit down at touchscreen kiosks, put on headphones, and call up any work in the show on demand, and in isolation.

I've found it most helpful to, when possible, get a bunch of monitors and mock-up the individual galleries so that I can judge how the sounds mix ahead of time.  This has definitely led to works being moved around and/or substituted. I also think it is very important to make sure that artists know from the beginning if their piece will need to be at a lower volume, or if there will be a lot of sound bleed in their gallery, so that they have proper expectations.  Artists often propose good solutions to these problems, and their tolerance for aural interference really varies from piece to piece. Sometimes it proved better to substitute another piece that the artist and I felt could handle the interference.

I won't know how these approaches pan out until the show goes up, but beyond this I've been trying to have an attitude of embracing the cacophony and presenting it as an aspect of the show from the beginning.

Best,
Glenn


Glenn R. Phillips
Senior Project Specialist and Consulting Curator
Department of Contemporary Programs and Research
Getty Research Institute
1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, CA 90049-1688

tel. 310.440.7666
fax. 310.440.7778
>>> Bruce Wands <[log in to unmask]> 09/20/07 8:48 AM >>>
Hello everyone,
Our best results with the NY Digital Salon happened in venues with several small rooms, like the 
Circulo de Bellas Artes in Madrid. We'd use the room for a single installation or interactive work. This 
allows the work to stand on its own, without visual or aural interference. It also limits the acoustical 
problems that arise from sound bleeding into other aras of the venue. I have found that sound is one 
of the major problems when dealing with new media installations. In venues that had large gallery 
spaces, we would often build small rooms or install temporary walls to provide a division between 
the works. In some cases, we opted for headhones instead of speakers. Another issue is the choice of 
using a monitor, LCD panel or projector. Many times, the ambient light in a room is not conducive for 
a piece that uses projection.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager