JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  September 2007

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM September 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Geographies of children - race and punishment

From:

Jon Cloke <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Jon Cloke <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:24:53 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (277 lines)

For those of you so inclined...

Jon Cloke


School Discipline Tougher on African Americans

By Howard Witt

September 25, 2007, Chicago Tribune

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-070924discipline,1,6597576.story?ctrack=1&cset=true

AUSTIN - In the average New Jersey public school, African-
American students are almost 60 times as likely as white
students to be expelled for serious disciplinary infractions.

In Minnesota, black students are suspended 6 times as often
as whites.

In Iowa, blacks make up just 5 percent of the statewide
public school enrollment but account for 22 percent of the
students who get suspended.

Fifty years after federal troops escorted nine black students
through the doors of an all-white high school in Little Rock,
Ark., in a landmark school integration struggle, America's
public schools remain as unequal as they have ever been when
measured in terms of disciplinary sanctions such as
suspensions and expulsions, according to little-noticed data
collected by the U.S. Department of Education for the
2004-2005 school year.

In every state but Idaho, a Tribune analysis of the data
shows, black students are being suspended in numbers greater
than would be expected from their proportion of the student
population. In 21 states-Illinois among them-that
disproportionality is so pronounced that the percentage of
black suspensions is more than double their percentage of the
student body. And on average across the nation, black
students are suspended and expelled at nearly three times the
rate of white students.

No other ethnic group is disciplined at such a high rate, the
federal data show. Hispanic students are suspended and
expelled in almost direct proportion to their populations,
while white and Asian students are disciplined far less.

Yet black students are no more likely to misbehave than other
students from the same social and economic environments,
research studies have found. Some impoverished black children
grow up in troubled neighborhoods and come from broken
families, leaving them less equipped to conform to behavioral
expectations in school. While such socioeconomic factors
contribute to the disproportionate discipline rates,
researchers say that poverty alone cannot explain the
disparities. 'There simply isn't any support for the notion
that, given the same set of circumstances, African-American
kids act out to a greater degree than other kids,' said
Russell Skiba, a professor of educational psychology at
Indiana University whose research focuses on race and
discipline issues in public schools. 'In fact, the data
indicate that African-American students are punished more
severely for the same offense, so clearly something else is
going on. We can call it structural inequity or we can call
it institutional racism.'

Academic researchers have been quietly collecting evidence of
such race-based disciplinary disparities for more than 25
years. Yet the phenomenon remains largely obscured from
public view by the popular emphasis on 'zero tolerance'
crackdowns, which are supposed to deliver equally harsh
punishments based on a student's infraction, not skin color.

That's not what the data say is happening. Yet the federal
Education Department's Office of Civil Rights, which is
charged with investigating allegations of discriminatory
discipline policies in the nation's public schools, has
opened just one such probe in the past three years. Officials
declined requests to explain why.

There's more at stake than just a few bad marks in a
student's school record. Studies show that a history of
school suspensions or expulsions is a strong predictor of
future trouble with the law-and the first step on what civil
rights leaders have described as a 'school-to-prison
pipeline' for black youths, who represent 16 percent of U.S.
adolescents but 38 percent of those incarcerated in youth
prisons.

Relatively few school districts scattered across the country
have begun to acknowledge the issue of racial disparities in
discipline and tried to do something about it.

In Austin, after administrators discovered that black youths
accounted for 14 percent of the school district's population
but 37 percent of the students sent to punitive alternative
schools, they introduced a program in some schools based on
encouraging positive student behaviors rather than punishing
negative ones.

At one school, Pickle Elementary, which serves mostly
Hispanic and black students, the results were dramatic-
disciplinary referrals dropped from 520 in 2001-2002 to just
20 last year.

'I am not going to give up on a child and suspend him or send
him to an alternative school,' said Julie Pryor, who was the
principal of the school when the behavioral program was
implemented and is now a district administrator. 'Washing our
hands of a child will never change his behavior, it just
makes it worse. These are children. It's up to us to be
creative to find ways to help them behave.'

But academic experts say many more school administrators,
when confronted with data showing disparate rates of
discipline for minority students, react like officials in the
small east Texas town of Paris and strenuously deny
accusations of racial discrimination.

Paris is the sole school district in the nation currently
under investigation by the federal Education Department to
determine whether higher discipline rates for black students
there constitute institutionalized discrimination. The probe
has been under way for more than a year.

'The school district has been a leader and very progressive
when it comes to race relations,' Dennis Eichelbaum, the
attorney for the Paris Independent School District, said in
an interview earlier this year.

That perspective is not shared by the families of many of
Paris' black students, who make up 40 percent of the school
district's nearly 4,000 students.

'They say there's no racism here, but if you go inside a
school and look in the room where they send the kids for
detention, almost all the faces are black,' said Brenda
Cherry, a Paris civil rights activist who assembled some of
the complaints that sparked the federal investigation.
'Unless black people are just a bad race of people, something
is wrong here.'

Exactly why black students across the nation are suspended
and expelled more frequently than children of other races is
a question that continues to perplex sociologists.

Socioeconomic factors are certainly at play, researchers
believe.

'Studies of school suspension have consistently documented
disproportionality by socioeconomic status. Students who
receive free school lunch are at increased risk for school
suspension,' according to 'The Color of Discipline,' a 2000
study by Skiba and other researchers in Indiana and Nebraska.
Another study concluded that 'students whose fathers did not
have a full-time job were significantly more likely to be
suspended than students whose fathers were employed full
time.'

But those studies and others have repeatedly found that
racial factors are even more important.

'Poor home environment does carry over into the school
environment,' said Skiba, who is widely regarded as the
nation's foremost authority on school discipline and race.
'But middle-class and upper-class black students are also
being disciplined more often than their white peers. Skin
color in itself is a part of this function.'

Some experts point to cultural miscommunications between
black students and white teachers, who fill 83 percent of the
nation's teaching ranks. In fact, the Tribune analysis found,
some of the highest rates of racially disproportionate
discipline are found in states with the lowest minority
populations, where the disconnect between white teachers and
black students is potentially the greatest.

'White teachers feel more threatened by boys of color,' said
Isela Gutierrez, a juvenile justice expert at the Texas
Criminal Justice Coalition, a watchdog and policy group.
'They are viewed as disruptive. What might be their more
assertive way of asking a question, for example, is viewed as
popping off at the mouth.'

Nor has the decline of court-ordered integration across the
nation and the gradual resegregation of urban schools in
recent decades made much difference in disciplinary rates.
Even in urban schools where most of the students are black,
black youths are still disciplined out of proportion to their
population, the data show. In Washington, D.C., for example,
black students are 84 percent of the public school population
but 97 percent of the students who are suspended. Other
researchers believe that zero-tolerance policies, which
encourage teachers and administrators to crack down on even
minor, non-violent misbehavior, are exacerbating racial
disparities. Some states, such as Texas, are so zealous that
they have criminalized many school infractions, saddling tens
of thousands of students with misdemeanor criminal records
for offenses such as swearing or disrupting class.

The school security climate, in turn, can reinforce race-
based expectations about which students are most likely to
require discipline.

'Most suburban schools, where the students are more likely to
be white, purchase security equipment that is meant to
protect children-for example, hand scanners that make sure
that the parent/guardian picking up the child is legitimate,'
said Ronnie Casella, an expert on the criminalization of
student behavior at Central Connecticut State University. 'In
contrast, urban schools choose equipment such as metal
detectors and surveillance cameras that are meant to catch
youths committing crimes.'

The new behavioral program being tried in Austin, and some
6,500 schools nationwide, seeks to turn zero tolerance on its
head in a bid to slash the number of suspensions, expulsions
and other punishments meted out by teachers.

Called 'Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports,' the
intensive regimen requires a commitment from an entire
school, including training of students in the behaviors that
are expected of them and re-education of teachers and
administrators in the use of positive motivational
techniques.

The interactions of individual teachers with their students
are minutely scrutinized by a team of experts to pinpoint
communication breakdowns, and specialized counseling teams
are deployed to work with students who present the most
serious discipline issues so that classroom teachers are not
left to deal with the problems on their own.

'Most schools use a get-tough, punish-the-kids kind of
perspective, which results in the kinds of racial
disciplinary disparities we see across the country,' said
George Sugai, a professor of education at the University of
Connecticut who helped create the positive behavioral
program. 'We come at it from the other perspective: If you
teach kids the behaviors that are expected, you have a
greater likelihood of success. It's really more about
changing how adults interact with kids than it is about
changing the kids.'

Schools like Pickle Elementary in Austin that are using the
positive behavioral program often report sharp reductions in
their disciplinary referrals. But Skiba, who is currently
studying the effectiveness of the program, cautions that it
does not always eliminate racial disparities.

'They've been very successful at reducing rates of suspension
and expulsion while making schools function more
effectively,' Skiba said of the schools using the program.
'But if you look at the data by race, what you find is that
some discrepancies still exist. It's not enough to put this
program in place and say, ‘We are happy to reduce our rates
of suspension,' because what we might have done is reduce our
white suspensions and increase our African-American
suspensions. There's just no silver bullet for this problem.'

(c) 2007 Chicago Tribune

_____________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest
to people on the left that will help them to
interpret the world and to change it.

Submit via email: [log in to unmask]
Submit via the Web: portside.org/submit
Frequently asked questions: portside.org/faq
Subscribe: portside.org/subscribe
Unsubscribe: portside.org/unsubscribe
Account assistance: portside.org/contact
Search the archives: portside.org/archive

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager