JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90  September 2007

COMP-FORTRAN-90 September 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: parallel programming

From:

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Fortran 90 List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:42:16 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (89 lines)

Hello,

Ian Chivers wrote:
> I'm currently updating our Fortran Resource file
> and wanted to get a feel for how many people were
> involved in parallel programming in Fortran.

I believe that two questions of greater pertinence are:

How many Fortran programmers would use parallel programming
if it were easier to do efficiently in Fortran?

-and-

How many Fortran programmers will be using parallel programming
when their desktop system is a multiprocessor?

When the state-of-the-art is changing as fast as it is today,
answers about the past don't say much about the future.

> the current file can be found at
> 
> http://www.kcl.ac.uk/fortran/pdfs/fortran_resources.pdf
> 
> In that file we identify the following types
> of parallel programming
> 
>   automatic
>   co-array fortran
>   hpf
>   mpi
>   openmp
>   posix threads
> 
> So could you take the time to answer the following questions.
> 
>  do you do parallel programming?

Yes, for 25+ years.

>  if so which method do you use?

Co-arrays whenever possible.
Any of MPI, OpenMP, & pthreads, unfortunately, usually.
I haven't used HPF, PVM or tcgmsg in years.
Automatic usually isn't.  That is, automatic parallelization
will work right after application compilers work (nearly) perfectly.

>  if you currently are doing parallel programming
>  would you move to co-arrays if they were
>  available?

Every time.  In a heartbeat.

The only downside to co-arrays is _if_ they are removed
from the f08 standard, and relegated to a secondary document,
there will be substantial doubt over the standard's commitment
to parallel programming.  Aside from creating a subset standard
(that has proven to be disastrous every time it's been tried),
it will encourage vendors to _not_ implement co-arrays,
on the grounds that at least one motivation of the secondary document
is to enable the easy removal of co-arrays later.

>  would you move to another hardware platform and operating
>  system to be able to use co-arrays?

I think the term "another hardware platform" is ill-stated;
nearly everything is x86 these days.  How different is different?
Many compiler vendors make their compilers available
for Windows and MacOSX and Linux.  The availability of the compiler
is a greater concern than the OS.

And this question depends upon many variables beyond Fortran.
Such as, but not limited to: the overall performance of the systems
within my range of choice, what my customer wants me to use
(read: has available for their own use), the perceived need
for portability of the resulting program, the anticipated lifetime
of the resulting program, and the relative cost of using
any of the available systems.

Modulo the above, when I purchase a new system, or influence
the purchase of a new system, the "co-arrays story" is of primary
importance.

-- 

Dan Nagle
Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
February 2023
November 2022
September 2022
February 2022
January 2022
June 2021
November 2020
September 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
December 2019
October 2019
September 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager