>
> Yep, shouldn't be so much trouble. I'll put it on the to-do list. - The
> issue was that this was implemented before we had proper experimental
> type definitions to know which C-C transfers to work with. So the natural
> question is: what type of experimental transfers should this use?
> SpinDiff?
>
In the current implementation that is indeed the transfer that I specify
when loading C-C spectra into analysis (even though that is not the
actual transfer mechanism used in many of our C-C experiments).
However, aside from the issue of C-C transfer mechanisms (and C-N
transfer mechanisms), I thought it might be useful to have a general
tool for showing the relative positions of two sites/nuclei (independent
of what experiment we are talking about). I did not actually realize
that it needs to know the transfer mechanism (I seem to remember being
able to access this from the resonance shift list, which is not
specifically correlated to any particular experiment type?).
Patrick
|