Hi Tim
>> What is not so fine is that only the assignment in the carbon dimension
>> is copied. The assignment in the hydrogen dimension is lost.
>>
>> Is 'reproduce peaks' supposed to behave like this?
>
>No, and it doesn't do this when I test. One thing that springs to mind is
>that the two spectra may be under two different shift lists and you
>already have 1H shifts at positions different to the destination spectrum,
>thus the 1H resonances are outside of the assignment tolerances and the
>assignment is not transferred. - If this is the case you could use a
>completely new shift list or the same one as the source via the Shift List
>column in Menu::Experiment::Edit Experiments.
I have set up the project so that I have one 'Experiment' with all my HSQC
with the different decoupling powers that I want to calibrate. For each HSQC
I then have two peak-lists, one for the left and one for the right part of
each doublet.
So here is what I did:
First I added peaks in my left and right lists in an undecoupled spectrum.
Then I opened a new HSQC (with cw-decoupling on) in the same experiment as
the undecoupled spectrum. In this spectrum the 1H shifts has changed for the
left and right parts of the doublets.
If I now clone the peaks from the undecoupled spectrum to the empty peak
list of the decoupled spectrum a get a copy of the peak a the expected
position (where there is no intensity) with assignment in both the H and C
dimensions.
If I instead reproduce the peaks only the assigenment in the C dimension is
copied. The peaks are positioned at the same coordinates as in the source
spectrum.
>If this is not the case, maybe have a look if the appropriate 1H resonance
>options are present in the Edit Assignment popup for a copied peak, and if
>you can manually set the correct assignment there. This will give me a
>better idea of the situation.
If I use the Edit Assignment popup on the reproduced peaks it does suggest
the right assignment.
Kaare
|