Or fox=corruption of French faux, hence, "there are no atheists in
false holes."
At 12:25 PM 8/17/2007, you wrote:
>What are foxes atheists? -good for them
>P
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>Behalf Of Roger Day
>Sent: 17 August 2007 13:25
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: on the etc side
>
>I thought the point of S&M was for the participants to gain some sort
>of pleasure (for me, some indeterminate value of pleasure) from the,
>uh, experience. It looks too much like torture, and seems to me the
>govt and the private kind seem to normalise each other. Or something
>like that. See also 'camwhores' in this respect somewhat.
>
>The superiority bit is new on me, although I'm a bit sheltered in
>these regards. Goths are insufferable, and seem to lie along the same
>axis.
>
>With regards to atheists and foxholes, I hate that phrase. I think
>there were and are a lot of atheists in foxholes.
>
>Roger
>
>On 8/17/07, Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > andrew burke wrote:
> > > An interesting insight into business a la The Sopranos ... by Tom
> > > Robbins in The Village Voice at
> > > http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0733,robbins,77515,2.html
> > >
> > > I think kinky sex is a near cousin to poetry. That's my excuse ...
> > >
> > >
> >
>http://chasemeladies.blogspot.com/2005/01/non-kinky-sex-is-waste-of-time.htm
>l
> >
> > Kinky sex nevertheless requires the existence of non-kinky sex in order
> > for its kinks to be discernible as such. What would be the point of S&M,
> > if it didn't allow its practitioners to go around feeling superior to
> > people who only do "vanilla"?
> >
> > Dominic
> >
>
>
>--
>My Stuff: http://www.badstep.net/
>"In peace, sons bury their fathers. In war, fathers bury their sons."
>Roman Proverb
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.0/957 - Release Date: 16/08/2007
>13:46
|