Hi Steve,
Would it not still be preferable (although more time intensive) to find
the target among one's own data? This way one is sure to capture all
kind of site specific scanner characteristics such as fx spatial
distortions due to B0 inhomogeneities and non-linearities in the
gradient system of the scanner (the latter can be quite significant at
higher field strengths).
cheers
William
Steve Smith wrote:
> Hi - yes, in the new release we're using IRTK with the same settings.
> The difference in the registration is that the recommendation is to use
> FMRIB58_FA as the target directly.
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> On 9 Aug 2007, at 17:19, Ged Ridgway wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> Will the new release (which, like everyone here, I'm very much looking
>> forward to) still ship with Daniel Rueckert's ITRK stuff? And if so,
>> with the same nreg parameter file etc? I.e. is it just the TBSS
>> method/target which has changed, or the non-rigid reg software itself?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ged
>>
>> Steve Smith wrote:
>>> However, you might like to wait for the new release
>>> which has slightly different registration - registration in TBSS
>>> directly to a new FA template space.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
> Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
>
> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
> +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
> [log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|