JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  August 2007

PHD-DESIGN August 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: a question

From:

Danny Butt <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Danny Butt <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:03:50 +1200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (85 lines)

Victor's question is a good one and I support the impetus that  
motivates it, but I think the answer is simple enough.

It's hard enough to bracket out and describe the design component at  
the production side, as anyone who has tried to foster design  
awareness within technology/engineering or marketing/product  
development in companies in the pre-ipod days will know. But doesn't  
it become even harder to identify exactly how design inputs are  
present in the "effects" of this work and to differentiate them from  
the effects of technology, marketing, social policy, subjectivities  
developed through education, media, etc.? I'm not saying that I don't  
agree that the imbalance should be shifted, I'm just saying that its  
harder to get a fix on what is "design" at the consumption end,  
because (as we've found on the list recently) one has to make complex  
methodological decisions about how you would find out this  
information, and the kinds of methodologies available in a novel  
field such as "design research" will come from different intellectual  
histories as Ken suggested. And I think few of us are as capable as  
him in such broad sweeps across the humanities, social sciences and  
applied fields such as management that would be necessary to  
confidently approach this:). So it's simply easier to keep something  
squarely in "design" at the process side, with all its limitations.

One place a lead would need to be taken from is cultural studies, and  
also (as Johann mentioned) science and technology studies. Is there  
anything like du Gay's "Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony  
Walkman" from a more design-informed perspective? This would be a way  
of testing how such consumption-side (or "results-side") research  
might work. New media studies perhaps brings in this approach.

Juris' question is very interesting. My sense is that the economic  
development policies around in the "creative industries" in the  
former british empire are where design is being given such  
classificatory power. In NZ for example, <http://www.nzte.govt.nz/ 
section/13680.aspx>. Does someone like Ross King's work on space and  
urban design provide a useful example?

Regards,

Danny

ps - Against my better judgement, a shot back at Lubomir and Ken for  
distinguishing "politics" from "process" or even "the pleasure of  
finding things out". Isn't the actual implementation of design (in  
product development or anything else) a process which involves not  
"materials" or "knowledge" but people? And where there are people,  
there are politics. Why lament its incursion into "design" when it is  
already there in the beginning? (And when it is fun and useful to  
talk about ;)?) As an educator, I am consistently trying to get  
students to understand the politics of the contexts where they have  
to make design decisions, as this allows them to achieve success.  
"Those who don't do politics, get done in by politics"....

--
http://www.dannybutt.net



On 4/08/2007, at 5:08 AM, Victor Margolin wrote:

> Dear colleagues:
> I have a question for the list. Why is so much research attention  
> given to the process of design and so little to its results - the  
> products that are the outcomes of designing, their value and social  
> consequences. It seems to me that one result of design research  
> should be to serve as a critical lens for evaluating the results of  
> designing. Of course, research into sustainable products is a  
> promising direction but there are so many more things that are  
> designed about which we don't know much. What about the way that  
> new digital products like cell phones and ipods are changing  
> socialization values. What about the changing ideas about the  
> design of public space.We seem to leave all those and other  
> questions related to the social consequences of designing to other  
> disciplines.
> -- 
> Victor Margolin
> Professor Emeritus of Design History
> Department of Art History
> University of Illinois at Chicago
> 935 W. Harrison St.
> Chicago, IL 60607-7039
> Tel. 1-312-583-0608
> Fax 1-312-413-2460
> website: www.uic.edu/~victor

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager