Isn't this e-mail's topic and it's appearance contradict each other?
It comes from William Scott's e-mail account, but signed as coming from Paul Emsley.
How do we figure out who actually wrote this e-mail with or without control access.
The easiest way is to assume that it is coming from Bill, he just decided to sign as a Paul to disprove his own point.
On the other way, it is only 7:30 am in Santa Cruz, then it is unlikely to be Bill, which means that e-mail was sent by Paul.
Worth looking at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes Wiki page, isn't it?
Vaheh Oganesyan
-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of William Scott
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 10:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] CCP4 Wiki
Most of us register on the CCP4 bb with our own names. If we say
something stupid, it damages our reputation in front of our peers. A
similar approach can be used for the Wiki. Control access, and limit it
only to people who register with their own name and who are registered to
the ccp4 bb.
-- Paul Emsley
Kay Diederichs wrote:
> Anastassis Perrakis schrieb:
>> Kay - disagreeing once was enough ... so:
>>
>> I share your thoughts about the wiki !
>>
>> However, the dynamics of Wikipedia are an interesting issue and relate
>> to 'vandalism'.
|