Dear Gary,
Indeed, that was not properly explained. I have improved the
documentation. The effect will only be seen when we finish the
changeover to the new machinery though.
Thanks for pointing it out,
Rasmus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Rasmus H. Fogh Email: [log in to unmask]
Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge,
80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. FAX (01223)766002
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Gary S. Thompson wrote:
> Rasmus Fogh wrote:
>
> >Dear Gary,
> >
> >The two alternatives are equivalent. For good reason - peakDim.position
> >actually uses peakDim.numAliasing and does the same calculation as you
> >would otherwise do yourself.
> >
>
> would it be worth adding a comment to this effect in the numAliasing
> field or the value field of the datamodel?
>
> regards
> gary
>
> >I thought the peakDim.value approach was a
> >bit simpler, but it is a matter of personal taste which one you prefer.
> >
> >
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr Gary Thompson
> Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology,
> University of Leeds, Astbury Building,
> Leeds, LS2 9JT, West-Yorkshire, UK Tel. +44-113-3433024
> email: [log in to unmask] Fax +44-113-2331407
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
|