Take a look at Teklenburg, Timmermans and van Wagenberg, "Space syntax:
standardised integration measures and some simulations", who propose a
relativisation of their own, in response to looking at how d- and
p-value relativisations work.
http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=b200347
Victor Ferreira wrote:
> Hello All,
> i have a basic question that in my readings of space syntax i never saw
> mentioned, everyone nowadays seems to be using D values for RRA, but in
> the Social Logic of Space the D are advised for use in systems thave a
> "root" and for the others P is recomended. Why everyone doesn´t use the
> P value in RRA, or i'm i missing something here? (since i'm playing eith
> the algorithms for calculating RA this problem arised).
> If that is answred in some article, please could you point me to it?
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Victor Ferreira
|