On behalf of Joachim since he has not permission to post to ROLLOUT
mailing list.
--------------------
Hi Ulrich,
I have corrected the lists (I guess the txt list has just not been
reuploaded after recreation). Please have a look and let me know if you
still see problems.
What concerns log4j - this is served by the jpackage repository and the
list only contains rpms provided by us. In addition you will need to add
some rpms pulled in from the sl(c)4 repository and the jpackage
repository dependending On your setup.
For the mismatch of i386 vs. i586 - this is still there and indeed
strange. The reason for it is that yum reports the rpm as a 586 while
the rpm name contains 386. I guess this is because of the setup of the
machine where it has been build.
I have put Owen in CC to comment.
Cheers,
Joachim
Ulrich Schwickerath wrote:
> Dear (*),
>
> I had a quick first look at this new release. First of all thanks for
> providing this release, and also a text version of the rpm package list.
> Since we use the .txt version of the package list to create our software
> setup, this helps us a lot.
> Unfortunately, for this new release, I found some inconsistencies:
>
> - the txt version contains:
> glite-WN-3.1.0-3.noarch.rpm
> while the html version quotes
> glite-WN-3.1.0-1.noarch.rpm
> other examples are:
> edg-gridftp-client
> glite-WN
> glite-yaim-clients
> glite-yaim-core
> ...
> - the txt version contains
> log4j-1.2.8-1.noarch.rpm
> which is not listed on the html page
> - dcache-client has arch i386 in the text version but i586 in the html
> one
>
> I've succeeded to access the files as listed on the page but not the
> once quoted on the web page, therefore I assume that the html version
> contains the correct package list. Is this correct ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Ulrich
|