To the best of my knowledge, yes.
> Hi Peter,
> Thank you! Does that mean that I was wrong about the Siemens scanner
> collecting odd slices first, when the total number of slices is even?
> Dan
>
> On 6/26/07, Peter Fried <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> I ran into the same problem when I started. You'll want to create a text
>> file that reads {1, 3, 5, ..., 0, 2, 4, ...} (each number on a new
>> line).
>>
>> This is fsl-speak for {2, 4, 6, ..., 1, 3, 5, ...}, which is the
>> interleaved order for an even number of Siemens' slices.
>>
>> I'll attach the version I use for a 34-slice acquisition on a Siemens.
>> Note that it is a slice-order file, not a slice-timing file as the name
>> suggests.
>>
>> -Pete
>>
>> > Hello,
>> > I am not sure which slice order option to use. We use a Siemens 3T,
>> and
>> > collect an even number of
>> > slices; my understanding is that in this situation the odd slices are
>> > collected first.
>> > The interleaved option "0 2 4... 1 3 5" looks like it is even numbers
>> > first, but in the instructions for
>> > making a slice order file, it says the first slice should be 1, not
>> > zero...so perhaps the interleaved
>> > option is really doing odd slices first (ie, '0 2 4' refers to the
>> first,
>> > third and fifth slice)? Is using a
>> > slice order text file that says "1 3 5 ... 2 4 6..." the same as using
>> the
>> > interleaved option?
>> > Thanks,
>> > Dan
>> >
>>
>>
>
|