JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for TB-SUPPORT Archives


TB-SUPPORT Archives

TB-SUPPORT Archives


TB-SUPPORT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TB-SUPPORT Home

TB-SUPPORT Home

TB-SUPPORT  May 2007

TB-SUPPORT May 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Update 24

From:

Yves Coppens <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 19 May 2007 11:01:55 +0100

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (87 lines)

Hello,

From my experience of update 23 and 24, I do not recommend to anyone
to upgrade their site until all the current problems have been
resolved. In particular do not upgrade your DPM! 
However, do install the latest lcg-voms.cern.ch!

If you do wish do upgrade some components, below is my
experience of what works and does not and some of the changes to be
aware of.

The new VO style support in yaim seems to work fine.

Yaim provides support for software manager and production pool
accounts (e.g. atlassgm01, atlassgm02,...) Unfortunately, this new
feature does not work or is fiddly, so you should keep your old
users.conf and group.conf files.    


Depending from which version of gLite you upgrade from, you'll need to
apply some of the following changes to your site-info.def:

Add and set the SITE_SUPPORT_EMAIL variable.

There is a new way to define queues, so you will need to add something
along the lines: 

ALICE_GROUP_ENABLE="alice"
ATLAS_GROUP_ENABLE="atlas"
...
SHORT_GROUP_ENABLE="atlas alice babar biomed cms dteam hone ilc lhcb
ngs ops zeus calice" 

if you got a queue assigned to each VO and short queue for all
VOS. The variables VO_${VO}_QUEUES are not used any more - keeping
them will not crash yaim (as expected).

There is a new inoffensive YAIM_LOGGING_LEVEL variable. I found out
that setting it to NONE was equivalent to setting it to WARNING.

If you read the release notes carefully, you'll find out that there is
a new way to run yaim. One can now configure a CE as follows:

/opt/glite/yaim/bin/yaim -c -s /root/yaim-conf/site-info.def -n CE 

Once the configuration is over, yaim will wait for a CTRL-C, so
you'd better not use that on workers. Shortly after running yaim on my
CE as above, my gatekeeper ended in a locked state:

$ service globus-gatekeeper status
edg-gatekeeper dead but subsys locked
$ 

The gatekeeper ended up in the same state after I had rerun yaim
again. I've got no idea about what caused this and I had never
encountered this problem in the past, so something to watch out 
for and to investigate.  	

There is an ugly bug(or rather design flaw) in config_sw_dir. When yaim 
runs on workers, it will try to do a recursive chmod on your software 
area. In my case, this resulted in permission denied and error messages 
for every single file in my +50GB /software directory :( Now, imagine if 
big sites start this automatically on all workers! For more on this, 
see the "NOTICE - VOBOX vs. VO software area ownership" in ROLLOUT. I 
really think, an EGEE broadcast should have been issued and not simply an
email to ROLLOUT.

You can upgrade your VOBOX provided you've got the 3.0.1-15 version
(from release 24 - release 23 crashed) of yaim and you take the
precautions mentioned in Marteen's email.

Once you do upgrade DPM, do not forget to change the port in
BDII_SE_URL. THe new DPM uses a BDII rather than a GRIS. 

I'm aware there is a middleware certification process, some testing at
CERN and limited testing on the PPS (unfortunately), but when I
see the type of horrors that reaches production sites, I'm lead to say
that the certification and testing is totally ineffective or highly
superficial or even nonexistent. I'm a culprit for the lack of testing
on the PPS, but we have very little time to perform any test at all! There
are plans to do more testing in the PPS, but I still wish we would
have more than one day for this, and in particular when new major
functionalities are introduced, and that more time would pass before
releases go from the PPS to production. 

Yves

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager