Agree, I've taken a look at the 1:2500 data and it certainly
look much more useful.
>
> Have you tried the 1:2500 maps from that period (also
> historical digimap
> scans)? One of my students has used this data in a slightly
> different context
> (Denbighshire/Shropshire) in an attempt to link evidence of
> mining to current
> maps through GIS. Despite the extra data needed, he found the
> 1:2500 were not
> only much better in terms of 'image quality' but contained
> more relevant
> detail.
>
> Bob
|