JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CONTEMP-HIST-ARCH Archives


CONTEMP-HIST-ARCH Archives

CONTEMP-HIST-ARCH Archives


CONTEMP-HIST-ARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONTEMP-HIST-ARCH Home

CONTEMP-HIST-ARCH Home

CONTEMP-HIST-ARCH  May 2007

CONTEMP-HIST-ARCH May 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Tara, resource or heritage?

From:

John Carman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

John Carman <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 9 May 2007 11:05:39 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (424 lines)

I'm afraid I don't agree with Paul Belford.
I am little unnerved that someone based at English Heritage should be apparently unaware of ongoing debates concerning whether archaeological sites etc. should be considered as 'resources', 'heritage' or whatever, the differences of appreciation of what these terms mean, and indeed international preferences in their use. I'm also surprised -- given EH's growing concern for communities as revealed in its own literature -- at the rather simplistic view of this Sarah reveals.
Tara is of course a prehistoric site of international significance. It is also a site of cultural significance to Irish people -- not only the present inhabitants of Eire but others within the island of Ireland, and the Irish diasporan community elsewhere in the UK and across the world. While the legal niceties may in practice limit the formal decision process to Eire, I see no reason for denying the rights of others to have a view and indeed to express it in a way that the Irish authorities can take into consideration. I am happy to concede that these are emotional issues, frequently generating more heat than light, but the fact that people care deeply about these places is also a consideration to be taken into account.
There is much more to managing the archaeological heritage than following procedure, as I'm sure Sarah and Paul know very well! (;-))
All best
John

Dr John Carman
Birmingham University Research Fellow and Senior Lecturer in Heritage Valuation
Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity
Arts Building
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham B15 2TT
Tel: +44 (0)121 414 7493
Fax: +44 (0)121 414 3595
Email: [log in to unmask]



-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion List for Contemporary and Historical Archaeology
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of MAY, Sarah
Sent: 09 May 2007 10:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Tara, not the Celts, please


Hi Matthew,   

the Irish people are the citizens and residents of Ireland.  Its their
landscape, and if they want to change it in ways that people living
elsewhere don't like - its their choice.  The same is true of any
country.  

The international community - a much less well defined term but in this
case members of mailing lists like this one and their supporters -
should only intervene when there is a breach of international agreements
(which there hasn't been) or when a group within a country is being
oppressed by another - which isn't alleged either. Most of the people
arguing against the current route are academics. Most of the people
arguing for it are local residents.

Aside from anything else, there are plenty of people in Ireland who are
arguing on all sides of this issue, and I don't suspect that they care
that much about what people who don't know the intricacies think.  

All the best
Sarah

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Butler [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 09 May 2007 10:26
To: MAY, Sarah; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CHA] Tara, not the Celts, please

Sarah makes some very interesting and worthwhile points.  But looking at
the 
way much of the Irish landscape has changed over the last decade - many 
ghastly and inappropriate new developments - I wonder if we really can
have 
confidence in the Irish "Community" (whatever that may mean) to sort
these 
things out without external pressure...Not that the British "community"
has 
been much better!

Matthew Butler
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MAY, Sarah" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [CHA] Tara, not the Celts, please


Firstly, the site has been designated a National Monument which is the
highest level of protection the Irish Republic affords - the same as for
the significant standing monuments in the region. Any further work at
the site will be measured - by professional archaeologists of standing
and commitment - against benefits both cultural and economic.

Secondly, referring to the site as a resource begs the question - what
is it a resource for?  In this circumstance before the present work the
site was not known - so it did not have significance for any living
group.  Now it is known and has the potential to increase our
understanding of a type of site that has been investigated with very
interesting results elsewhere. The more investigation, up to and
including destruction through excavation the better - in my personal
view (note - not the EH view).

Thirdly, the issues surrounding the archaeology associated with the M3
are complex and political (mostly small p). The scheme has been through
an extraordinarily thorough planning and consultation process in which
conflicting interests have been weighed. Amazingly, given the emotions
involved there have been no serious allegations of corruption, the
arguments are simply that at the end of the process there are still
conflicting interests.

When you conduct research somewhere its natural and right that you
should engage in its politics, and of course when the past of
disenfranchised communities is destroyed because they don't have the
power to engage in those politics it can be helpful to bring in powerful
voices from the international community. But I see no disenfranchised
group.  Ireland has immensely powerful and well thought out heritage
legislation and conducts thorough and high level archaeological research
on its development sites, particularly roads.

The international community should have confidence in Irish people to
sort these issues out themselves.

All the best
Sarah May

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion List for Contemporary and Historical Archaeology
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Charles E. Orser
Jr.
Sent: 08 May 2007 21:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Tara, not the Celts, please

It seems to me that the desire to help save the resource far outweighs
the
semantics.
Chuck Orser
Distinguished Professor of Anthropology

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion List for Contemporary and Historical Archaeology
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Emily J. Weglian
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Tara, not the Celts, please

Dear Dr. Horning and others,

While I am not an expert in Irish Archaeology, my understanding was that

the newest site found is likely Iron Age in date. Susan Johnston, my
co-author on this letter, has more expertise in this matter, and she
pointed out that the new site is just like a structure found at Dun
Ailinne, which probably dates to the first few centuries (CE). Given
this,
the use of the word Celt is not unreasonable, although your desire to
avoid
the romanticization of the Celts and Celtic identity are certainly
valid.
However, since the name Celtic means something to non specialists and
resonates with many who are also not experts in this field, and given
that
our intended audience is broad, we hope that you will understand the
word
choice in the letter.

Most sincerely,

Emily Weglian


On May 8 2007, Horning, Dr A.J. wrote:

>While I certainly support the protection of Tara and the cultural
>landscape in which it is situated, I am surprised and disappointed to
>see that the emotional language of Ireland as the homeland of the
>mythical Celt is alive and well even in the halls of American academe.
>My understanding of the new site is that it is likely Bronze Age in
>date, and as such, certainly interesting and significant but hardly
>likely to be 'Celtic', however loosely defined.....
>
>Audrey Horning (Irish Post-Medieval Archaeology Group, and etc.)
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Discussion List for Contemporary and Historical Archaeology
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Emily J. Weglian
>Sent: 08 May 2007 17:30
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: help save Tara!
>
>Some of you may have heard about the ongoing situation at the site of
>Tara, in Ireland. This site is of major importance in Irish prehistory,
>having been the focus of ritual activity for 5000 years. In the Iron
>Age, it was a major center of ceremonial activity, and one of the
places
>where kings were made in Celtic Ireland.
>
>There is more about the site below, but the essence of the situation is
>that the Irish government are building a highway through the area,
>despite archaeological protest, and in the process a new site of major
>importance has been found. Since there is a danger that the roadway
will
>continue and the site will not be preserved, we are trying to galvanize
>archaeological opinion in the U.S. to protest. We are asking you to let
>us know if you are willing to have your signature added to the letter
>(find below). If so, please send Emily Weglian
([log in to unmask])
>an email with your name and professional affiliation, indicating your
>support, and she will send it on to the relevant people. We only have a
>short window of opportunity, so we are asking you to please respond by
>Wednesday, May 9, at 5:00 EST.
>
>We will be sending this letter to the Irish Times, the Irish
>Independent, the Washington Post, the New York Times, and any Irish
>government officials whose addresses we can locate. If you have other
>suggestions, please feel free to send those along.
>
>Please send this on to anyone else you can think of who might be
>interested in signing it
>
>Thanks for your help.
>
>Susan Johnston, George Washington University Emily Weglian, Cuyahoga
>Community College
>
>p.s. While preparing this, we came across the following story (see the
>second letter down). It's only a snippet, and you have to be registered
>to read the whole thing, but it should convince this you that is a
>serious threat to Ireland's archaeological heritage!
>
>http://www.unison.ie/irish_independent/index.php3?ca=53&issue_id=15602
>
>
>The letter reads as follows:
>
>We the undersigned would like to add our voices to those who are
>concerned about the recent discovery of an ancient Celtic structure
>along the path of the M3 motorway as it passes close to the Hill of
>Tara. From the description that has been circulated, it is clearly of
>singular importance, documenting the ancient ritual life of the people
>who lived around Tara, and also the connections between those people
and
>others who celebrated in similar structures in Leinster, Ulster, and
>Connacht. Not only does it add to the vision of Tara, where people have
>been celebrating their lives and burying their dead for 5000 years, but
>it also shows how much Ireland was one people, with similar rites
>happening throughout the island during all that time. As such, it
rivals
>places in the New World like Tikal, Monte Alban, Machu Picchu, Pueblo
>Bonito, the Great Serpent Mound, Cahokia, or indeed Stonehenge, in both
>cultural and spiritual importance.
>
>The National Roads Authority was told that such sites would be
>encountered but seemingly refused to listen, secure in the apparent
>knowledge that all could be taken care of with prior survey. But this
>site shows that they were wrong. They were told that Tara wasn't just a
>site, but a landscape, a complex of monuments that, in combination with
>the topography, place names, mythology, and history make this a
uniquely
>well-preserved place of truly international importance. It will suffer
>irrevocable damage if this road continues. It is bitterly ironic that
>this landscape has survived to the present due to careful custodianship
>in the past, based on thorough-going understanding and sensitivity, and
>it seems short-sighted, ill-conceived, and indeed arrogant, to think
>that we will be doing less than our predecessors.
>
>Now is the time to re-think the path of this motorway. Is it really the
>only path that it can take? We join Irish archaeologists and the
general
>public in asking the Irish government to halt what is tantamount to the
>destruction of Ireland's archaeological heritage. An archaeological
site
>of this importance warrants the re-routing of a motorway and some sort
>of guarantee for its continued survival in the future. Stop and
consider
>before you go any further, and destroy what those who came before us
had
>the wisdom to preserve.
>
>
>Dr. Susan A. Johnston, George Washington University Dr. Emily J.
>Weglian, Cuyahoga Community College
>
>Tara and the M3: background.
>
>The history of the motorway to be built around it is long and complex:
>
>http://hilloftara.blogspot.com/2006_12_31_archive.html
>
>The short version is that, after soliciting opinions from many
different
>segments of society, the government decided to go ahead with a route
>that passes within a kilometer or two of the hill itself. While it
>avoids the central part of the site (the Hill of Tara), Tara is
actually
>part of an extensive ritual complex in a landscape literally packed
with
>prehistoric features. The following link shows relevant maps:
>
>http://www.nuigalway.ie/archaeology/Tara_M3.html
>
>
>Most recently, literally 24 hours after beginning construction, a major
>site was uncovered:
>
>http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/story.asp?j=218091166&p=zy8x9y87z
>
>Dr. Conor Newman, an archaeologist at the National University of
Ireland
>in Galway, gave an interview to NPR in the U.S. where he explains the
>significance of the site. You can hear it at:
>
>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10011926
>
>
>There is a significant danger of this site not being preserved, but
>instead only recorded, and roadwork will continue.
>
>--
>Dr. Emily J. Weglian
>
>--------------------------
>contemp-hist-arch is a list for news and events in contemporary and
>historical archaeology, and for announcements relating to the CHAT
>conference group.
>-------
>For email subscription options see:
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/contemp-hist-arch.html
>-------
>For CHAT meetings see:
>http://www.bris.ac.uk/archanth/events/chat.html
>--------------------------
>
> Dr. Audrey Horning
>Lecturer in Historical Archaeology
>School of Archaeology and Ancient History
>University of Leicester
>University Road
>Leicester LE1 7RH
>tel. +44 (0)1162522604.
>

-- 
Dr. Emily J. Weglian

--------------------------
contemp-hist-arch is a list for news and events
in contemporary and historical archaeology, and
for announcements relating to the CHAT conference group.
-------
For email subscription options see:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/contemp-hist-arch.html
-------
For CHAT meetings see:
http://www.bris.ac.uk/archanth/events/chat.html
--------------------------

--------------------------
contemp-hist-arch is a list for news and events
in contemporary and historical archaeology, and
for announcements relating to the CHAT conference group.
-------
For email subscription options see:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/contemp-hist-arch.html
-------
For CHAT meetings see:
http://www.bris.ac.uk/archanth/events/chat.html
--------------------------

________________________________________________________________________
_________
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
personal 
views which are not the
views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have
received 
it in error, please delete it
from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or 
disclose the information in
any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English
Heritage 
may become publicly available.

--------------------------
contemp-hist-arch is a list for news and events
in contemporary and historical archaeology, and
for announcements relating to the CHAT conference group.
-------
For email subscription options see:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/contemp-hist-arch.html
-------
For CHAT meetings see:
http://www.bris.ac.uk/archanth/events/chat.html
--------------------------


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.6/794 - Release Date: 5/8/2007
2:23 
PM


_________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the 
views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it
from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in 
any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.

--------------------------
contemp-hist-arch is a list for news and events
in contemporary and historical archaeology, and
for announcements relating to the CHAT conference group.
-------
For email subscription options see:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/contemp-hist-arch.html
-------
For CHAT meetings see:
http://www.bris.ac.uk/archanth/events/chat.html
--------------------------

--------------------------
contemp-hist-arch is a list for news and events
in contemporary and historical archaeology, and
for announcements relating to the CHAT conference group.
-------
For email subscription options see:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/contemp-hist-arch.html
-------
For CHAT meetings see:
http://www.bris.ac.uk/archanth/events/chat.html
--------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager