JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCPNMR Archives


CCPNMR Archives

CCPNMR Archives


CCPNMR@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCPNMR Home

CCPNMR Home

CCPNMR  April 2007

CCPNMR April 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: How to use "experiment series" for ligand titrations?

From:

Tim Stevens <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

CcpNmr software mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:10:05 +0100

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (108 lines)

> > > - can I use the "Follow shift changes" dialog for ligand titrations?
> >
> > Yes. This is the place. It will group series of peaks, assign them and
> > extract the shift changes.
> >
> but how exactly do you do it? Is there an online help page available for
> this function (clicking in our installation on the "help" button in the
> FollowShiftChanges dialogue just opens up an empty help window...).

In-line with other mailing list threads, the documentation is a bit out of
date and is just missing for the FollowShiftChanges popup because it is a
newer one.


> What are peak groups, and how do you use them?

By peak groups I mean peaks assigned to or derived from to the same
resonances, so that you can follow chemical shift changes and intensity
changes.


> We are in the situation where we have 25 HSQCs loaded in (pH titration),
> with 25 peak lists, but when we open FollowShiftChanges it complains
> that "there is only one shift list, do you want to create the rest?".

When following a resonance in a titration the idea is to record different
chemical shifts for the resonance under different conditions. Each shift
list contains all the shifts for a given set of conditions.


> Sure enough, after clicking "yes", "Measurement lists" shows 25 shift
> lists and only one of them has peaks in it, but peaks from 3 HSQCs
> (that's how many we have assigned at the moment).

So the peaks are associated with a given shift list by virtue of their
experiment being associated with the conditions that the given shift list
represents.

If all the experiments in the series were linked initially to only one
shift list then that list would have chemical shifts for all of the
assigned peak lists that contribute to the experiments.

If the experiments are now put into separate shift lists the shifts would
still be recorded in the initial list even if there are now no peaks to
represent them.

When chemical shifts are curated they have values calculated from a
weighted average of peak positions for a specific shift list. If you
unlink an experiment from a shift list the values are recalculated using
the remaining experiments.

Shifts representing no peaks can be removed with "Delete Orphans" in the
BrowseResonances popup.


> What exactly is the difference between shift lists and peak lists, and
> how do you get the program to put new peaks in the correct list?
>
> If you delete the peaks from the second and third HSQC in shiftlist1,
> and use "copy assignments" the peaks still end up in
> peaklist2(shiftlist1) instead of shiftlist2...

Hopefully I've covered most of the shift list explanation above. Peaks
only go with a list because of their experiments. So if you want the peaks
from an experiment to contribute to a different shift list then the
experiment has to be linked to that shift list.

The shift values are weighted averages from positions, this is separate
from real picked peaks and resonances allow assignments to be recorded
for the same atoms under different conditions.


If you have three HSQC peak lists that cannot use separate shift lists
then I think all of the spectra for those peak lists might be linked to
only one experiment. (This is just a guess from what you describe, so let
me know if this is wrong.)

In the CCPN data model experiments (what you did) are separate from
spectra (a resultant bit of data) so you can record FIDs, projections etc
under the same experiment.

Although it is not enforced by the underlying data model, if you load a
spectrum and call its experiment "HSQC", when you already have one with
that name, Analysis thinks you mean to associate multiple spectra with
that one experiment. Hence all "HSQC" spectra and peaks work with only one
shift list.

The solution in this instance would be to reload two of the HSQC spectra
into experiments with different names, copy peaks from their equivalent in
the original multi-spectrum experiment, then delete the extra spectra in
this original spectrum.

Hope this helps,

T.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Dr Tim Stevens			Email: [log in to unmask]
 Department of Biochemistry            [log in to unmask]
 University of Cambridge        Phone: +44 1223 766018 (office)
 80 Tennis Court Road	               +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
 Old Addenbrooke's Site 	       +44 1223 364613 (home)
 Cambridge  CB2 1GA	   	WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
 United Kingdom 		       http://www.pantonia.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2- -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager