<[log in to unmask]>
<[log in to unmask]>
<[log in to unmask]>
A<[log in to unmask]>
<[log in to unmask]>
<[log in to unmask]>
A<[log in to unmask]>
<[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.4 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: -4.9 : BAYES_00
Stephen,
I don't agree there should be different queues as long as you provide the
necessary 32-bit compatibility on 64-bit node. This is what compatibility
mode is intended for, there is no reason to prevent its use on grid.
Michel
--On jeudi 26 avril 2007 16:28 +0100 "Burke, S (Stephen)"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> LHC Computer Grid - Rollout
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Antun Balaz
> said:
>> Since this is a SubCluster property, each Subcluster can
>> publish this info for itself properly.
>
> Indeed - I think there should always be separate queues for 32 and 64
> bit, and different queues can have different subclusters, even if the CE
> head node is the same.
>
> Stephen
*************************************************************
* Michel Jouvin Email : [log in to unmask] *
* LAL / CNRS Tel : +33 1 64468932 *
* B.P. 34 Fax : +33 1 69079404 *
* 91898 Orsay Cedex *
* France *
*************************************************************
|