JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA  April 2007

ARCHIVES-NRA April 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

(Fwd) Re: (Fwd) Restricted space and photo storage

From:

Michele Losse <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Michele Losse <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:21:11 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (75 lines)

Posted on behalf of a colleague:-


Hi Mandy,

If the frame is not particularly important to the collection, it is
more practical to remove and discard it. If the frame is important to
the collection, you will have to make sure that it is conservationally
sound. If the answer to this is 'no' then you have two options, 1)
make it conservationally sound or 2) remove the frame and store it
separately.

You have to bear in mind that in order for a frame to be archivally
safe for photographs, it has to be 'silver- safe', which is a higher
specification than that required for prints and illustrations.
Generally, frames are not silver-safe, and the best option for the
longevity of the photograph therefore, is to bin the frame.

Unless of course, if you are a 'Greenery-yallery Grosvenor Gallery
type of conservator', in which case "it doesn't matter how important
the frame is... it is part of the photograph's 'nature' and must be
kept, regardless of expense."


Regards

Jonathan Farley
Senior Conservator
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
[log in to unmask]





On 19 Apr 2007 at 15:19, Michele Losse wrote:

> You may want to respond to Miss Ingram...
> ------- Forwarded message follows -------
> Date sent: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:53:23 +0100
> Send reply to: Amanda Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
> From: Amanda Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Restricted space and photo storage
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> [ Double-click this line for list subscription options ]
>
> Dear All,
>
> I am working with an extremely restricted storage space and I would
> like anyone's thoughts on two questions concerning the storage of
> photos. Firstly, I have a number of framed photos - is it common
> practice to remove frames unless they are of significance? I would
> like to do this in order to reduce the space required. Secondly,
> though it is not ideal by any means, I am considering boxing photos
> by size rather than in series order as this will be a much more
> efficient use of space. I wonder if anyone has gone down that path
> before with any kind of collection and, if so, did it cause any
> major problems? I would say our photos are certainly not used
> regularly. Replies, please, to [log in to unmask] (having
> problems changing my email address on the listserv!)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amanda Ingram
> Archivist
> Pembroke College, Oxford
>
> ------- End of forwarded message -------
>



------- End of forwarded message -------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager