Careful, Michael; even a passing reference to "Sla**dot" can lead to
a flamewar. ;-)
While biomed scientists seem reluctant to use the E word, some
imaginative chemists aren't:
http://tinyurl.com/249gw9
Francis
On 4 Mar 07, at 22:09, Michael Kenward wrote:
> It seems that some scientists are reluctant to use the "E" word in
> their
> papers. Being implicit is, they suggest, a bit of a cop out.
--
Dr Francis Sedgemore
Freelance journalist and science writer
tlf: +44.7840191336; web: www.skysong.eu
**********************************************************************
1. To suspend yourself from the list, whilst on leave, for example,
send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following message:
set psci-com nomail
2. To resume email from the list, send the following message:
set psci-com mail
3. To leave psci-com, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message:
leave psci-com
4. Further information about the psci-com discussion list, including list archive,
can be found at the list web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/psci-com.html
5. The psci-com gateway to internet resources on science communication and science
and society can be found at http://psci-com.ac.uk
**********************************************************************
|