Ged,
Hello. Thank you I would have never found this paper.
Jason.
--- Ged Ridgway <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Steve Smith wrote:
> > We did some comparisons originally but now both
> FAST and SPM versions
> > have changed over the years so they are somewhat
> out of date. I don't
> > have a list of more recent comparisons....
>
> There is a small FAST/SPM2/SPM5 comparison within
> this paper, though
> it wasn't the real focus of the work:
>
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2006.880587
>
> I think the paper used current versions of FAST and
> SPM2; SPM5's
> segmentation code has subsequently changed a little.
> There didn't seem
> to be much in it...
>
> Best,
> Ged.
>
|