Here's the link:
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1879500,00.html
On 25 Mar 2007, at 21:16, Julius Bonapart wrote:
> Do you have a link I could follow to see his arguements as to why
> they're not cinema? Do you know them, and if so, would you care to
> expose them?
> Thanks,
>
>
> On 3/25/07, Nicholas Hamlyn <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> His argument was that films like this, and Borat, Al Gore's film,
>> Supersize Me etc, were not Cinema, and should not be seen in cinemas.
>> He wasn't commenting on the quality of the film a such.
>>
>> Nicky Hamlyn.
>>
>> On 25 Mar 2007, at 17:13, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>
>> > The critic Mark Kermode insulted this film, calling it conceptual
>> art
>> > and said "keep conceptual art out of my cinema"! on the bbc2 culture
>> > show i think
>> >
>> > . * * Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon. After hitting
>> 'reply'
>> > please always delete the text of the message you are replying to. To
>> > leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to:
>> > [log in to unmask] For help email:
>> > [log in to unmask], not the salon. **
>>
>> *
>> *
>> Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
>> After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message
>> you are
>> replying to.
>> To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to:
>> [log in to unmask]
>> For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
>> **
>>
>
> *
> *
> Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
> After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you
> are replying to.
> To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to:
> [log in to unmask]
> For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
> **
>
*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**
|