JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SEDA Archives


SEDA Archives

SEDA Archives


SEDA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SEDA Home

SEDA Home

SEDA  March 2007

SEDA March 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Students' writing skills

From:

Professor Phil Race <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:52:36 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (197 lines)

Thanks, James for bringing this to our attention.

I still work with students on matters relating to study-skills development
(not least academic writing), as well as with staff on assessment and
teaching methods. The symptoms described are certainly widespread, and
indeed affect some disciplines much more than others.

Two thoughts. (1) With widening participation policies, there are now many
more students in higher education than formerly, including many from home
backgrounds where books were not part of the environment. Many students
don't read books for pleasure, and this is bound to reflect in their
writing skills.

(2) Many students are much more comfortable writing on screen than on
paper, and sometimes produce much better text when they can see what they
are doing on screen (and use spellchecks, and so on). The same students
with pen and paper are often much more clumsy.

(3) I too notice that many students are much better orally than in
writing. In one of my own contributions to the field ('How to Study',
2003,Oxford, Blackwell), in my section aiming to help students improve
their academic writing, one of my suggestions is to get other people to
read out their writing back to them. Then, they often realise some of the
deficiencies in their writing and correct them (not least when whoever is
reading back their work has difficulty working out the sentence
structures).

(4) [This may not be what you want to read!] Perhaps it is unwise to try
to train all of our widened-participation student population into the
academic writing culture which used to prevail in higher education when
only 5% of the population was present there? Perhaps we should adjust our
expectations and requirement toward the actual student population we now
have, and downgrade the significance of good written communication, and
balance it better with oral communication?

"Dumbing down!" I hear you thinking? My experience is however that
students are every bit as 'bright' as ever - probably brighter, but their
portfolio of skills and attributes has certainly changed, and is likely to
continue to change. I don't think we can simply blame schools and
teachers. Well-written books are simply a lesser part of the lives of many
young people that used to be the case, out of school in particular.

Phil Race
Leeds Metropolitan University
www.phil-race.com


(2) > Members of the SEDA list may wish to comment on the request for
> information
> below from Prof. Diane Korrbrot.
>
> From: "kornbrot" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: "'Becta's ICT Research Network'" <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: "'Tony Marcel'" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 8:31 AM
> Subject: [ICT Research Network] Writing skills: Evidence based
> improvement?
>
>
>> For some time we have had a serious problem that we believe is
>> widespread
>> across disciplines in the UK and the USA. We are unsure how to deal with
>> it.
>> We are appealing to all of you for EVIDENCE BASED solutions.
>>
>> THE PROBLEM IN BRIEF
>> We teach on an undergraduate psychology degree and are very concerned
>> about
>> the writing skills of students of all years, some of who appear bright
>> in
>> oral academic discussion.
>>
>> In many cases their written English is appallingly bad. Not only are
>> their
>> spelling, grammar and sentence formation very poor, but they simply
>> cannot
>> communicate their ideas in writing. This inability has many serious
>> consequences. Their abilities will be underestimated in coursework
>> essays
>> and written exams; the failure to articulate in clear and structured
>> English
>> will impede their thinking; they will fail to get or keep any
>> interesting
>> job that requires clear writing of reports or other communications.
>>
>> REASONS and Solutions
>> One of us is new to the University and previously worked mostly with
>> Ph.D.
>> students. The other has been at the University for many years, but has
>> become used to this situation as writing skills have gradually declined.
>>
>> We have discussed this widely with our psychology colleagues, face to
>> face
>> and by email. They have suggested many reasons for the problem, ranging
>> from
>> addiction to texting to not reading classic novels. They have also
>> suggested
>> possible solutions, many of which are time consuming for both students
>> and
>> teachers. However, none of us knows of much evidence to support our
>> ideas.
>> Even though the problem may have its origins in school level education,
>> we
>> are looking for solutions that can be applied at the tertiary level.
>>
>> PLEASE HELP
>> So we are appealing to you as experts to provide us with solutions that
>> have
>> been 'tried and tested'. All suggestions and information will be
>> gratefully
>> received and then summarized and distributed to all members of this list
>>
>> THE PROBLEM IN MORE DETAIL
>> Many students' cannot spell; their vocabulary is poor and mistaken; they
>> have little idea of syntax, cannot punctuate, have no idea of what
>> constitutes a sentence, let alone a paragraph. Ignorance of genitive
>> formation and of number agreement is the least of the problems.
>> Malapropisms
>> abound. They know neither what is necessary for a sentence (e.g. a
>> finite
>> verb to constitute a main clause) nor when a new sentence is required.
>> Sentences are long meander, and so are hard to understand Students seem
>> unable to detect their errors if/when they proofread their drafts. Many
>> do
>> not seem to realise that written communication differs from oral
>> communication, not only by convention, but necessarily in that the
>> former
>> lacks context and prosody.
>>
>> This raises several issues and has ramifications.
>> (a) In very many cases lecturers cannot understand what is meant or
>> intended, often even after considerable effort. I am not sure whether
>> the
>> writer knows. In numerous cases, when asked, they cannot recover what
>> was
>> intended or if anything was intended. I cannot give marks for what I
>> cannot
>> understand, and potential parts of an argument are lost, disabling any
>> force
>> and coherence of what comes before and after.
>> (b) Many students will do badly in written exams because, apart from
>> annoying errors, their communication and expression of ideas will fail
>> them
>> and/or irritate examiners.
>> (c) In many cases the failure to articulate in clear and structured
>> English
>> impedes clear thought. Something that I would like to convey to students
>> is
>> that writing is often a means by which we can explore our own thinking.
>> (This is something about which the late Peter Wason wrote cogently, and
>> is
>> part of psychology itself.)
>> (d) Since lecturers cannot simply ignore the problematic bits of
>> writing,
>> focus on the main aspects of essays or dissertations - clear conveyance
>> of
>> research, data or ideas, accuracy, relevance, argument structure - is
>> hindered. Time is wasted on lower level correction.
>> (e) Most university graduates expect and are expected to get certain
>> kinds
>> of employment: jobs where they have to produce writing, e.g. reports and
>> other communications. Students who are as disabled as ones that I have
>> encountered cannot hope to gain or keep such positions. Certainly in
>> applications for jobs or further studentships they cannot compete with
>> people who can write without egregious error. If they are not helped by
>> the
>> time they leave university, preferably school, the education system (and
>> that includes us) has seriously failed them.
>>
>> When tutors correct or draw attention to the problems, they fear that
>> they
>> are wasting time or using it inappropriately and that students feel the
>> same.
>>
>> Diana Kornbrot, Tony Marcel
>>
>> Professor Diana Kornbrot
>> University of Hertfordshire
>> College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK
>> Email:  [log in to unmask]
>> Web:   http://web.mac.com/kornbrot/iWeb/KornbrotHome.html
>> Blended Learning Unit
>>  voice: +44[0]170 728 1315 fax: +44[0] 170 728 1320
>> Psychology
>>  voice: +44[0]170 728 4626 fax: +44[0]170 728 5073
>>
>> Kornbrot
>> 19 Elmhurst Avenue
>> London N2 0LT, UK
>> voice: +44[0208  883 3657 fax: +44[0] 0208 444 2081
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager