Leah's right, but it's not <0.017, it's = 0.017, and that's for a
correlation, but the principle is the same.
J
On 22/03/07, leah quinlivan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just looked it up awhile ago, and i think APA format is (r = -.301, N =
> 50, p. < .017, 2-tailed, CI.95 = -.534,-.025). Thats the way I have it in my
> results
>
>
>
> On 22/03/07, David Hambrook <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello All,
> > This may sound like a very silly and basic question but I'm going to ask
> anyway... I'm in the initial stages of writing up my Masters dissertation
> and I have been told by a statistician at my university that when reporting
> the results of t-tests I should include 95% confidence intervals (CIs). I
> have never had to do this when reporting t-tests in the past. The format I
> would usually use fro reporting is t = 2.578, df = 19, p < 0.05 (for
> example). Have I been wrong all these years??? Any advice would be much
> appreciated.
> > Regards,
> > Dave.
> >
> >
> > David Hambrook
> >
> >
> >
> > MSc Student
> >
> > Mental Health Studies Programme,
> >
> > Institute of Psychiatry,
> >
> > Division of Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry,
> >
> > Kings College London (Guy's Campus),
> >
> > 9th Floor Capital House,
> >
> > 42 Weston Street,
> >
> > London SE1 3QD
> >
> > Mob: 0779 5025 868
> >
> > [log in to unmask] ; [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from
> your Internet provider.
>
>
>
> --
> Leah Quinlivan
--
Jeremy Miles
Learning statistics blog: www.jeremymiles.co.uk/learningstats
|