Hi, Tim.
Sorry for sending a message without a surname on it. That was a
banana-fingered error, was not intended to confuse, and hopefully won't
happen again.
I wrote a brief comment about what the scientific method is, and what it
isn't, and the next thing I know I'm being asked to choose sides on
something, but I have no idea what!
I'm not surprised you are struggling. What was the question again?
- Paul P.
-----Original Message-----
From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of TIM WALTER
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 5:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Thinking about philosophy
Paul Pickering <mailto:[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> For or against?
>
> The scientific method has a "for" and an "against"?
>
> I'm sure you'll have a reference for that.
>
> - Paul
I'm struggling to follow this anyway (and not sure how much I care) but
could all the Pauls stand up (and append your surnames), unless you are one
and the same, for and against!
--
Tim Walter
http://www.falklandsurgery.co.uk
FOIA disclaimers apply.
|