-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
### EMAIL ETIQUETTE RANT ###############
You replied to my email subject, with a blatant change in the topic. I
am annoyed by the way your email was submitted to this list. I am now
creating a reply to your subject, changing the subject in the process.
Are you annoyed too?
Email systems respect threads, making it possible to read high-volume
email lists, like this one, in a threaded mode, where threads can be
handled efficiently by subject. All email programs work with the email
protocols that take into account the subject or thread continuity of all
messages (check the detailed headers).
We do not have unlimited time to read email. Some email lists are high
volume and it is most efficient to receive and view email from these
lists in threads, defined by the subject. Please respect the subjects
of email list postings.
Every new posting creates a new thread with a new subject. There is a
very clear difference in both meaning and function of the "new message"
vs. "reply" or "reply-all" methods of sending email.
Some submissions to this list are new mail, but the submission is made
as a reply to a current posting. The submission changes the subject,
and replaces all the prior content with a new message.
Please do not do that. If you want to submit a new message, please use
your email client to draft a new message. Most email clients will help
you find the email address. It may seem easier or faster for you to
reply to the last email from the list, but it will make it harder for
hundreds or thousands of other people to find that new message, which
will get buried in the prior thread. It is more time consuming for the
readers to find new subjects. It will "confuse" the thread system and
the new message will disappear from a short list of threads in the email
archives.
If you have a new subject and you want to get replies to your subject,
please create a new message. Please do not reply to a current subject
with anything other than genuine comments on that subject.
If you receive an email message that is clearly off-topic, please email
this rant to the person who sent the email. Use some discretion,
sometimes topic associations can be loose, as one subject may raise many
issues. In cases of blatant and continuous abuse, despite many attempts
to educate the user, remove the subscriber from the list.
### END RANT ###############
J Labus wrote:
> In SPM 99, one could get the Beta and SE values that went into creating
> this
> plot by typing beta and SE. In SPM2 there is no variable called "SE". How
> can I access the SE used to create the 90% CI bars? Also, am i correct in
> assuming the betas are still the contrast estimates?
>
> Jen labus
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF6dHqxaCYN7qs0v4RAj7UAKCrVDbAnqf1Yso1dF/KF0wDxYibzACfRjmT
KbdBCqaGugLLJCKjBRda6YQ=
=rCt3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|