Strange, although it's quite funny and wittily done, the creator seems
to understand little or nothing about the relevant "scientific
evidence" and "meme" arguments.
It's a parody on words only, replacing the word God with Dawkins, in
an imaginary Dawkins dialogue, but it doesn't add any meaning to the
arguments IMHO. Pity.
(I'm no fan of Dawkins BTW. "Too sure" of his objective view of
science translating beyond science.)
Ian
On 3/2/07, Cherryl Martin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Very funny. (and thought provoking)
>
> Thanks Bob
>
> Cherryl
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Group concerned that academia should seek and promote wisdom
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of bob Macintosh
> Sent: 02 March 2007 1:47 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: shooting Dawkins
>
> Have a break! Have a laugh!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QERyh9YYEis
>
> Best wishes, bob Macintosh
>
|