JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Archives


COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Archives

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Archives


COMMUNITYPSYCHUK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Home

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Home

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK  March 2007

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK March 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Potential BBC3 programme

From:

Caroline Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The UK Community Psychology Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:47:19 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (171 lines)

I have been catching up with these discussions and would like to say how impressed I am with the collective response produced. I find it diffficult to know how to respond to these often individualising and pathologising projects 'about' young people and I really like the way you have all tackled this. it is really heartening to see how much thought and conviction has gone into this. 
 
I hope that any developments will be posted to the list as I really hope your ideas are taken up. 
 
Best of luck
 
Caroline
 
 
 
 

________________________________

From: The UK Community Psychology Discussion List on behalf of David Fryer
Sent: Fri 09/03/2007 11:21
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Potential BBC3 programme


Dear Rachael,
 
Thanks for producing the collective composite message. I think that is a really good way to proceed. I think a message from named people is better in this case than a message from 'the list' (partly because we don't know all list members would agree with the points and partly because if he wanted to take this forward Daniel would have to liaise with individuals). I am happy to have my name on it. 
 
I think there is a balance to be struck between a shortish accessible message which might interest Daniel enough to follow up and a longer more convoluted message which becomes less accessible and may go into the bucket. I think you have it just about right but fear carrying more load may make it buckle.
 
I certainly would not, personally, highlight the UNICEF report any more than you have because I think that though the UNICEF report is rhetorically useful in many ways (to persuade some of the scale of injustice),  I think the key point you/we want to get across in this message / re this programme issue is that children and young people need to be in the driving seat of vehicles which are to promote their interests, that a key issue is how to depower problematic adults etc. and that we need a new critical frame of reference relating to research and action (or as we would prefer to put it 'praxis') in relation to children and young people. 
 
Young people did not seem in the driving seat of the UNICEF work and, as I understand it, it will have increased the power of all sorts of adults but whether its impact (if any) on children and young people will be progressive or not yet to be seen. It will likely lead to yet more policies we might prolemetise re. children and young people's interests and, in particular, interventions which blame parents and children for socially caused problems. Methodologically, the UNICEF research seemed to me to be based on positivist survey methods using a bit of a hotch potch of standardised measures based on all sorts of cross cultural and other assumptions we might well be challenging if we did not agree with the outcome message. 
 
One typo (missing word) I spotted is in "children and young people in the UK experience some of the lowest levels of wellbeing richer countries"
 
Thanks
 
David

________________________________

From: The UK Community Psychology Discussion List on behalf of Rachael Fox {PG}
Sent: Thu 08/03/2007 23:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Potential BBC3 programme


Hi All,
So, I have edited, added and finalised the piece for Daniel Rawling.  I have put everyone's names at the bottom who indicated they would like me to - I have guessed in some cases people's titles, and in other cases i don't have any information for people - if I have got anything wrong please let me know!
 
There is a slight urgency to my post - I am actually going on holiday for just over a week tomorrow, so I think I will need to send it no later than 11am tomorrow morning, otherwise it will be too late.  In which case if there is anything wrong with it I really hope you will let me know, and i really hope it is ok when I send it!
 
So, clocks ticking til tomorrow!!
 
Rachael
 

Dear Daniel,

We are a group of people who subscribe to the UK Community Psychology Listserve, a discussion list.  One of our members, Anne Cooke, recently posted a request from yourself, asking for some ideas on a programme you are researching relating to young people.  We had some interesting ideas on the listserve, and Anne suggested we send them directly to you.  The following descriptions of our experiences working with young people and innovative ideas we had for your programme are collated from responses by the people listed.  If you have any questions or would like to discuss anything please don't hesitate to contact us.

 

We were very excited by the opportunity you are creating to explore the problems young people are experiencing in the UK. It is likely this issue will remain a live one well beyond the publication of the recent UNICEF report. Many of us on this list have been involved in raising debate, engaging in preventive work and lobby policy making at a local and national level in relation to problems young people face in their lives in ways that are meaningful for young people.

 

As community psychologists, when we work with young people on the issues that are pertinent to them and the problems they face, we attempt to explore social issues rather than individual issues.  We tend to see the stereotypical beliefs about young people's 'behaviours' (ie youth of today are useless, stick an ASBO on them) as masking much deeper problems in society, and the 'behaviours' themselves as symptomatic reactions (ie violence and aggression), reactions to much more complicated and very disempowering situations the young people find themselves in.  As you point out in your proposal, there are issues with gender, socio-economic status, race and background that young people face: young people from particular communities, backgrounds, race and gender are far more likely for example to be excluded by their school for behaviour the school sees as unacceptable: identical behaviour from young people of other backgrounds does not get punished in the same way (we can provide you with references  for this if you wish to pursue this body of research further).  

 

However, in addition to these societal issues which are pervading, individualising and blaming, there is the added stigma young people face, and that is our perception of youth itself.  Compounding all these societal causes are our societal beliefs of young people, and the way they are treated as a consequence.  Firstly we tend to think young people are incapable: of making reasoned decisions, of taking control of their lives, or of participating in their community (if they choose to).  Secondly we tend to believe they are vulnerable.  At developing stages in our lives we are indeed physically weaker, but that argument pretty much gets inadequate when working with six foot sixteen year olds!  We still believe however young people need protecting, in particular from harm from adults.  We tackle this however by taking control, as adults ourselves, by making decisions, by believing we can protect by knowing what's best.  In this way we remove self control from young people - we don't let them make their own decisions, eg they sometimes don't really get a reasoned choice over whether they take part in research.  Given recent findings published by UNICEF arguing that children and young people in the UK experience some of the lowest levels of wellbeing richer countries, we certainly don't seem to be acting in their best interests.

 

So, we as adults control young people's lives.  If they accept this we get nice 'well behaved' young people who grow into passive, uncritical, rule following adults - they learned how to work in the system - hence the difficulty we sometimes have in getting university students to think critically!  If they don't accept the unconditional respect we require from them, the arbitrary rules, the control exerted over them and the lack of power, they rebel.  We don't give them much room for this, and we certainly don't enable them to be assertive.  So these young people appear angry, frustrated and aggressive, and ultimately, we exclude them from areas of society like schooling and label them deviant.  Those 'modern behaviours' mentioned are interesting - in many ways they are modern responses to this lack of formal power.  Young people are acutely aware of this in modern society - they understand very well that they are being controlled.  They are also developing skills that make them more capable than us: they understand modern technology better, they have much healthier opinions about the environment and community psychological research done in schools for example show young people to be very good at explaining the core problems in their schools, that were very difficult for schools or teachers to see.  

 

 As psychologists and users of psychological services, members of our list would like to see these issues explored in a programme and would support you in doing so. What would be really great to see, instead of the show confirming to the young people that there is something fundamentally wrong with them, and that they need to learn new skills, is a show that allows the young people to explore the social conditions that have affected them.  

 

So an idea to incorporate into a programme might be a group of young people (who might perhaps have been labelled in one way or another) going on a physical journey to meet policy makers and others who may have had a hand in promoting the processes which have contributed to current circumstances. Similar perhaps to Michael Moore's "Roger and Me".

 

To turn the tables even further, what about a programme made by children giving information about the modern behavioural problems of teachers, educational psychologists, parents (and other adults of different genders, race, socioeconomic backgrounds, featuring a relatively wide range of ages and characters), in particular the many ways that these adults fail to respect children's rights, classify children in terms of various sorts of psychological deficits, assault them with corporal punishment etc., and especially focusing on the worrying issue that has emerged in the last 5-10 years: the increasing tendency of adults with power to exclude young relatively powerless people from places where they could learn and develop. The idea would be that these adult contributors would be taken by children on a physical journey of some sort, during which they will have the opportunity to confront and begin to deal with their particular behavioural issues, and also discover more about themselves and to develop new skills etc.

 

As you can see, when we look at adults in the same way we view children and young people, the results are quite surprising.  But the way adults interact with young people does have considerable effects.  Some really insightful research has been done with young people on their race or ethnic background for example, and how that has affected their experiences at school, and in turn their beliefs of themselves.  What have these things made them feel? How have they reacted? One step further would be to see if there are things that can be changed, not just within the young people, but in their schools and communities.  During the debates surrounding gang violence and the recent shootings in London, few if any young people living in the communities were approached to even ask them about the issues.  Why did no one attempt to hold talks with the young people, open dialogue try to resolve the issue directly? The method that is popular at the moment is more control, greater punishment, and more labelling of young people - while violence should not be condoned, we do seem to be making it much worse, rather than better - anger, frustration, lack of power and the aggression that goes with it seem to be somewhat 'modern' issues: anger management classes and other skill building exercises cannot have a great affect on such wide cultural issues.

 




Rachael Fox

Community Psychology Researcher

University of Stirling

 

Anne Cooke
Chartered Clinical Psychologist
Year 3 Director, Doctoral Programme in Clinical Psychology
Salomons: Canterbury Christ Church University

 

Carl Harris

Clinical Psychologist

Birmingham Children's Hospital

 

David Fryer

Reader in Psychology

University of Stirling

 

Gareth Foote

 

Annie Mitchell
Clinical Director
School of Applied Psychosocial Studies
University of Plymouth



Dr Jacqui Akhurst
Senior Lecturer: Psychology
York St John University




 

 

 

 

-- 

The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.

___________________________________ COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK. To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator Rebekah Pratt on [log in to unmask] 

-- 

The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.

___________________________________ COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK. To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator Rebekah Pratt on [log in to unmask] 


___________________________________
COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK.
To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML
For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator Rebekah Pratt on [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager