On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:31:23 +1300, Douglas Campbell
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>13. Section 2 "DCMI Abstract Model" - I'd like to suggest this has three
sub-sections to improve readability:
> - 2.1 Resources
> - 2.2 Descriptions
> - 2.3 Vocabularies
>Because these are currently all in one section I found I didn't realise I
was moving into a new area/view. This is particularly so with the
vocabularies part which offers a different/wider view.
Yes. Good point. I think adding those sub-sections would be good for
readability.
> I don't think the notes at the end belong as part of the "Abstract Model"
section and could sit in another section
OK. I don't feel strongly about that either way.
> (as sections 3 and 4 are also essentially notes or a continuation, eg.
section 3 is the first mention of "record" even though it appears in the UML
diagram).
Hmm. Now that you mention it, TBH, I'm not entirely sure that "record"
belongs in the "description (set) model" at all, as it's not part of what I
was calling in my reply to Jon the "information structure". But I think we
discussed that at some point and I was persuaded it was OK to leave it in.
Thanks
Pete
|