JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  February 2007

CCP4BB February 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Bio-rad DuoFlow

From:

Daniel Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Daniel Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:18:03 -0800

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (153 lines)

It still seems to me strange that Bio-Rad would build a machine that can
reach pressures suitable for reverse-phase chromatography, but then not
include software control for gradual pump acceleration. I tried to
communicate to BioRad corporate suits that many HPLC columns are too
fragile for abrupt pump acceleration, but it was like speaking Swahili.

Having typed that, I'm not up to date with the latest DuoFlow software.

For HPLC, I'm still very fond of Waters pumps and their gentle handling of
columns. I tried to communicate to Waters corporate suits that what the
academic world could use is their Breeze system with non-corroding pump
heads, but it was like speaking Swahili.

(FPLC is a trademark. The marketing hype has been so effective that many
people think that FPLC is a method.)

-Dan

On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, William Clemons wrote:

> In my old lab everyone was slowly converting to Bio-rad for
> chromatography. We had an Akta and subsequently bought two Bio-rad
> DuoFlow. I actually never made the conversion then but those that had
> didn't want to use the Akta anymore.
>
> Upon starting my own lab I got quotes for both an Akta and a DuoFlow
> and the cost difference was striking. As Tamir said, the DuoFlow
> really is plug and play and you can build up the system you want so
> just buying the basic may not get you far but relatively easily you
> can get all of the features of a mid-range Akta (mutiple buffer
> valves, column valves, multiwavelength (4)). I should add that in all
> my interaction with equipment reps at GE Healthcare I generally came
> away with the feeling that they don't care that much about academics.
> They have a real air of superiority which is enough for me to not buy
> from them (although I get all my columns from them!).
>
> There are a few downsides to the DuoFlow. The software is not as nice
> as that for the Akta but it is fairly easy to train on and all of my
> people have gotten along fairly easily with it. The pumps for the
> standard DuoFlow are rated for much higher pressures than we
> biochemists typically use so sometimes they can struggle with
> pressures below 40 PSI. We got around this by adding a pressure
> inducer past the pump and have had no problems since. The only other
> downside that I'd mention is that the service reps aren't very well
> trained so this may not be the best system if it is the first time
> you've seen an FPLC. We had a Service Rep come in who forgot to turn
> off the pump after his test runs. This happened on a Friday and no
> one noticed the pump was running until the following Tuesday. This
> killed the pump but they quickly came and replaced all the parts and
> we haven't had a problem since.
>
> My final point is that Bio-rad is really great (at least here in LA)
> with academics and we were able to bundle in all of our protein gel
> parts, DNA gel parts, PCR machines, Gel Doc etc for less than the
> quote for the equivalent Akta. In fact, I just had a second Duo-Flow
> installed yesterday and was able to again bundle in a lot more
> equipment for my slowly growing lab. Bio-Rad isn't perfect but they
> get at least a B+ from me for general support and in the end my
> experience continues to be a positive one. It is probably the best
> purchasing experience I had in my start up and the only one I haven't
> had some major regret on.
>
> Just my 2 cents,
>
> Bil
>
> On Feb 14, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Tamir Gonen wrote:
>
> > I beg to differ.
> >
> > I have been an AKTA explorer user for about 5 years and switched to
> > DuoFlow about 4 yrs ago and now have one in my own lab. The BioRad
> > DuoFlow is awesome. It never ever breaks. I never had any problems
> > with this machine at all, it takes any column (pharmacia or
> > otherwise) given the right adapters. The AKTA are really cumbersome
> > and complicated to use and teach on - its all inside a big black
> > box that looks (and feels) like a tank, while the DuoFlow has a
> > really simple design, and is basically "plug and play".
> >
> > The AKTA is really good for analytical applications when you have
> > very small amounts of your protein and of course you can detect
> > multiple wave lengths at a time (you can add special unit for multi
> > wavelengths on the biorad). The DuoFlow struggles  with very small
> > protein concentrations (<0.05mg/ml) and the void volume on its
> > tubing further dilutes the sample. If you know what you are doing,
> > it is easy to optimize the setup in such a way that you minimize
> > the void volume on the DuoFlow.
> >
> > Finally, the AKTA has an in line filter which always gets clogged
> > up when you have buffer with detergent. The DuoFlow does not have a
> > filter at all which means if your students and postdocs are not
> > careful, the filters in the column will get clogged. But all you
> > need to do is filter your sample prior to injection.
> >
> > BioRad service is not so great but if you take care of your machine
> > you really dont need to worry. It is really robust. Plus, for the
> > price of an explorer you could buy two top-of-the-line DuoFlow
> > systems together with columns.
> >
> > Tamir.
> >
> >
> > ______________________
> > Dr Tamir Gonen
> >
> > Department of Biochemistry
> > Box 357350
> > University of Washington
> > Seattle, WA 98195
> >
> > Tel: (206) 616 7565 (Office)
> > 	(206) 616 8529 (Lab)
> > Fax: (206) 685 1792
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > http://faculty.washington.edu/tgonen/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Feb 14, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Frank Lee wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for all the feedbacks on AKTA prime. They are so
> >> helpful that I have abandoned the idea of buying one. Now it is a
> >> choice between AKTA FPLC and Bio-rad DuoFlow. I heard that DuoFlow
> >> is not as robust as AKTA and that its parts break down often. The
> >> question is whether quality difference is worth price difference (~
> >> $10K). Any feebacks on DuoFlow would be highly appreciated!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Frank
> >>
> >> Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
> >> in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
> >
>
> ************************************
> Bil Clemons, PhD
> Assistant Professor of Chemistry
> Caltech
> 157 Broad Center
> MC 114-96
> Pasadena, CA 91125
> (626) 395-1796
> [log in to unmask]
> ************************************
>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager