Shall we go the whole hogarth Janet, and invite discussion on
perceptions of "New Formalism" and "Language"? Just to enlighten us?
Because I've noticed the occasional pejorative towards one or the other,
and I really want to be on the winning side...
(I'm actually with, as I am on many things, Groucho on this one. Clubs
et alia...)
Cal
-----Original Message-----
From: Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and
poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Janet Jackson
Sent: Tuesday, 23 January 2007 11:32 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Dipodic is...? (Re: is dipodic a no-no? )
Ok, who is going to define 'dipodic' for those of us less enlightened?
(Yes, I did look with Google and came up with various mentions of it
but no actual definitions. Learnt a lot of other nice new words
though!)
Janet
> Many folksongs & blues employ dipodic modes. Not a no-no at all in my
book.
-------------------------------------------------------
Janet Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
Poems at Proximity:
http://www.proximity.webhop.net
The choice is between nonviolence and nonexistence.
Martin Luther King Jr.
-------------------------------------------------------
==============================================================================
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may contain legally privileged or copyright material. It is intended only for
the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this
email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or
any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete this email from your system. The ABC does not
represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free. Before
opening any attachment you should check for viruses. The ABC's liability is
limited to resupplying any email and attachments
==============================================================================
|