JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ARCH-METALS Archives


ARCH-METALS Archives

ARCH-METALS Archives


ARCH-METALS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARCH-METALS Home

ARCH-METALS Home

ARCH-METALS  January 2007

ARCH-METALS January 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

American pre-Revolution iron production

From:

"Torbert, Barton" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Arch-Metals Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:06:12 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (147 lines)

Thanks for the reply.

So once war was declared all the production would have stayed
in-country.  So you seem to be saying that there was significant
American production available no matter how it was previously accounted
for.

Where was the ore coming from for the iron production in the Chesapeake
region?

Bart

-----Original Message-----
From: Arch-Metals Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Evelyne Godfrey
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 2:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Falling Creek IW side question

Hi,

I think that the situation so long as the American colonies were under
British control was that colonists were banned from keeping or selling
locally produced iron; cast iron was just being produced in America, and
it all had to be shipped straight to Britain where it could be taxed and
some of it perhaps sold back to the colonists. This was one of the
points of contention at the time of the Revolution. Of course by then,
colonists were regularly flouting the laws and casting cannons and all
sorts to use against the British Army. 

Supposedly by the mid-18th century, the Chesapeake region (Maryland and
Virginia) had been the worlds third biggest iron producer, after Russia
and Sweden, but colonial iron would have counted as "British" production
rather than "American" per se. 

The English settlers from Jamestown, who built that blast furnace at
Falling Creek just twelve years after arriving, were presumably being
pushed by the Virginia Company back in London to establish some sort of
profitable industry as soon as possible... they had started out looking
for gold of course, and when that didn't pan out as it were, they
decided to go after the iron ore. Even though work at Falling Creek came
to an abrupt end with the massacre of 1622, iron remained Virginia's
second big 'cash crop', alongside tobacco, up until the late 18th C, and
the blast furnaces were organised according to the plantation system,
just like the tobacco growing, i.e. with slave labour (sadly, slaves
continued to make up the bulk of the workforce in the Virginia iron
industry right up until 1864). 


cheers,


Evelyne





>>> Bart Torbert <[log in to unmask]> 1/24/2007 3:42 PM >>>
This discussion brings up a side question.

What was the iron production in pre-Revolutionary America?  The
question is relative to the Americans ability to  provide war needs from
native sources.

Bart

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Steve Gray <[log in to unmask]>
> The precursors of the furnaces are more likely to be Welsh rather
than English, 
> from such counties as Carmarthenshire, Glamorgan and Gwent.
> Yours Steve Gray
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Peter King 
>   To: [log in to unmask] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:08 AM
>   Subject: Re: Falling Creek IW
> 
> 
>   The precursors of the furnace would inevitably be English.  I
cannot think of 
> evidence from 1620s or earlier, but later English furnaces had
systems for 
> draining water from below the furnace, but I think the foundations
would have 
> been in stone.  However, at that period, timber-framing of buildings
was still 
> common in England, with lath and plaster between the timbers.  It is
thus quite 
> possible that other parts of the furnace buildings would be of
timber, not to 
> mention the waterwheel.  
> 
>   The traditional view is that furnaces went into blast in the autumn
and blew 
> until the early summer.  While this was not invariably done in places
where the 
> water-supply was good enough, it almost certainly has an element of
truth in it.  
> I would have expected May to be the anticipated end of the first
blast, not its 
> start.  On the other hand, if the furnace was in blast at the time of
the 
> massacre, I would expect it still to be (or have been) there and full
of its 
> large charge.  
> 
>   This is of course all speculation.  
> 
>   Peter King
>   49, Stourbridge Road, 
>   Hagley, 
>   Stourbridge
>   West Midlands
>   DY9 0QS
>   01562-720368
>   [log in to unmask] 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Arch-Metals Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of 
> James Brothers
>     Sent: 23 January 2007 02:47
>     To: Peter King
>     Subject: Falling Creek IW
> 
> 
>     Lyle Browning, the Falling Creek IW archaeologist, has proposed a
number of 
> possible explanations for the timbers recently discovered at the
site. While 
> much of the equipment at an ironworks (e.g. wheel, bellows, anvil,
and hammer) 
> rested on substantial timber structures, is there evidence elsewhere
for heavy 
> wood foundations for blast furnaces? Or is this more likely to be
part of the 
> wheel support/foundation or some other part of the water power
system? Or is 
> there another possibility that hasn't been thought of yet? If
Winchester 
> Cathedral could be built on a raft, why not a blast furnace? 
> 
> 
>     James Brothers, RPA
>     [log in to unmask] 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager