Hello,
Being new to this forum, I'm not sure this is the purpose for which it is
intended.
Nevertheless, one has to ask, with the proliferation of the term 'critical'
in geographical academic posts, and the seeming fashion for doing so, does
a real critical geography exist? Can a normalised approach to geography
critically examine the status quo, when it is part of said status quo?
Furthermore, is it not merely an exercise in academic branding, a more
acceptable and perhaps palatable term than 'radical geography'? Is there
any depth to a critical geography?
Any thoughts welcome.
Simon
|